2019
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on Brown and Savulescu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Algander's commentary puzzles over why the diachronic condition is added to the two standard preconditions for responsibility. 3 Levy agrees that our account of responsibility for health must be diachronic and that Brown and Savulescu are correct to emphasise this. 4 They claim that attention to the diachronic condition is our best way of scrutinising health outcomes and behaviour with a view to assessing responsibility.…”
Section: John Mcmillanmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Algander's commentary puzzles over why the diachronic condition is added to the two standard preconditions for responsibility. 3 Levy agrees that our account of responsibility for health must be diachronic and that Brown and Savulescu are correct to emphasise this. 4 They claim that attention to the diachronic condition is our best way of scrutinising health outcomes and behaviour with a view to assessing responsibility.…”
Section: John Mcmillanmentioning
confidence: 92%