2019
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Commentaries on ‘Responsibility in Healthcare Across Time and Agents’

Abstract: Let us first thank the four commentators who have taken the time to read and thoughtfully reflect upon our paper. In that paper, we discuss how responsibility concepts must be sensitive to the temporal (diachronic) and social (dyadic) aspects of health-related behaviour, if responsibility is to play a role in health policy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their response, Brown and Savulescu resist the implication that paying attention to the diachronic and dyadic nature of responsibility in health might in effect be a reductio of responsibility in health. 9 In any case, what they have done is demonstrate how those debating the role of responsibility for health should adopt an enriched version of the concept that can accommodate the complex relationship between behaviour and health.…”
Section: John Mcmillanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their response, Brown and Savulescu resist the implication that paying attention to the diachronic and dyadic nature of responsibility in health might in effect be a reductio of responsibility in health. 9 In any case, what they have done is demonstrate how those debating the role of responsibility for health should adopt an enriched version of the concept that can accommodate the complex relationship between behaviour and health.…”
Section: John Mcmillanmentioning
confidence: 99%