2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics

Abstract: Over the last decade, there has been an increasing body of work that explores whether sensory and motor information is a necessary part of semantic representation and processing. This is the embodiment hypothesis. This paper presents a theoretical review of this work that is intended to be useful for researchers in the neurosciences and neuropsychology. Beginning with a historical perspective, relevant theories are placed on a continuum from strongly embodied to completely unembodied representations. Predictio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

38
485
4
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 604 publications
(538 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
38
485
4
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional model, borne out of early aphasiology research, functionally locates language in a network comprised of inferior frontal and superior temporal areas of the left hemisphere, with the former in charge of speech production and grammatical processing, and the latter subserving comprehension and perception of language (Geschwind 1970;Ojemann 1991). However, subsequent neuroimaging studies have drawn into question this model by showing that linguistic -and in particular semanticprocessing appears to be linked to activation of neural circuits outside of the "core system" including what has always been considered as modality-specific areas (such as motor, auditory, or visual cortices; see e.g., Binder & Desai 2011;Boulenger et al 2012;Meteyard et al 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional model, borne out of early aphasiology research, functionally locates language in a network comprised of inferior frontal and superior temporal areas of the left hemisphere, with the former in charge of speech production and grammatical processing, and the latter subserving comprehension and perception of language (Geschwind 1970;Ojemann 1991). However, subsequent neuroimaging studies have drawn into question this model by showing that linguistic -and in particular semanticprocessing appears to be linked to activation of neural circuits outside of the "core system" including what has always been considered as modality-specific areas (such as motor, auditory, or visual cortices; see e.g., Binder & Desai 2011;Boulenger et al 2012;Meteyard et al 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This challenge has become particularly topical in recent years, due in large part to the development of embodied and grounded theories of cognition (e.g. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]). In the past few years a number of embodied proposals have been advanced, aiming to show that abstract concepts are grounded in the sensorimotor system, like concrete concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meaning of words is grounded in perception and action, as illustrated in recent years by the substantial literature within the embodiment research framework (for a review see Meteyard, Cuadrado, Bahrami, & Vigliocco, 2012). When we read words with strong sensory meanings we recruit the perceptual system to aid in comprehension, reflecting socalled Bmental simulation^(e.g., Barsalou, 1999;Glenberg & Kaschak, 2002;Stanfield & Zwaan, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%