“…Despite the fact that “the embodiment” is a label for different, and in some cases incoherent, approaches, most of its proponents agree that concepts—including abstract ones—are not arbitrary, amodal, and language-like symbols, as representatives of classic cognitive science typically assumed ( Fodor, 1975 ; Jackendoff, 2002 ). Instead, they are to emerge from the bodily interactions of individuals with their environments ( Clark, 1998 ; Barsalou, 1999 , 2008 ; Wilson, 2002 ; Borghi et al, 2018 ). Although some amodal models of number processing have been proposed in the past ( Groen & Parkman, 1972 ; Banks, Fujii & Kayra-Stuart, 1976 ), recently, there is growing agreement that mathematical concepts are indeed constrained by bodily activity and anchored, or systematically mapped, in sensorimotor systems ( Lakoff & Núñez, 2000 ; Moeller et al, 2012 ; Landy, Allen & Zednik, 2014 ; Dackermann et al, 2017 ; Wołoszyn & Hohol, 2017 ; Fischer, 2012 , 2018 ; Fischer & Shaki, 2018 ).…”