2018
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain

Abstract: One contribution of 23 to a theme issue 'Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain'. The capacity for abstract thought is one of the hallmarks of human cognition. However, the mechanisms underlying the ability to form and use abstract concepts like 'fantasy' and 'grace' have not been elucidated yet. This theme issue brings together developmental, social and cognitive psychologists, linguists, anthropologists, cognitive scientists, neuroscientists, philosophers and compute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
101
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(87 reference statements)
6
101
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, some abstract categories, such as abstract construct and abstract action , were difficult to predict from text‐based word vectors. This result is consistent with the recent view on abstract concepts that abstract concepts are not a unitary whole, but comprise a variety of different types of concepts (Borghi, Barca, Binkofski, & Tummolini, 2018). Furthermore, the prediction accuracy of many categories of property was much lower than that of other categories.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…By contrast, some abstract categories, such as abstract construct and abstract action , were difficult to predict from text‐based word vectors. This result is consistent with the recent view on abstract concepts that abstract concepts are not a unitary whole, but comprise a variety of different types of concepts (Borghi, Barca, Binkofski, & Tummolini, 2018). Furthermore, the prediction accuracy of many categories of property was much lower than that of other categories.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…More crucially, our results are consistent with embodied theories claiming that abstract words are not only grounded in perception-action systems but also evoke linguistically conveyed information (Dove, 2014(Dove, , 2019Borghi & Binkofski, 2014;Moffat, Siakaluk, Sidhu & Pexman, 2015). Specifically, the Words As social Tools proposal (Borghi et al, 2018; predicts that activating linguistic information also involves its embodied counterpart, the speech motor system; and here we have shown that limiting speech articulators during infancy and beyond (up to 72 months of age) might have a lasting association with subsequent language processes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Despite the fact that “the embodiment” is a label for different, and in some cases incoherent, approaches, most of its proponents agree that concepts—including abstract ones—are not arbitrary, amodal, and language-like symbols, as representatives of classic cognitive science typically assumed ( Fodor, 1975 ; Jackendoff, 2002 ). Instead, they are to emerge from the bodily interactions of individuals with their environments ( Clark, 1998 ; Barsalou, 1999 , 2008 ; Wilson, 2002 ; Borghi et al, 2018 ). Although some amodal models of number processing have been proposed in the past ( Groen & Parkman, 1972 ; Banks, Fujii & Kayra-Stuart, 1976 ), recently, there is growing agreement that mathematical concepts are indeed constrained by bodily activity and anchored, or systematically mapped, in sensorimotor systems ( Lakoff & Núñez, 2000 ; Moeller et al, 2012 ; Landy, Allen & Zednik, 2014 ; Dackermann et al, 2017 ; Wołoszyn & Hohol, 2017 ; Fischer, 2012 , 2018 ; Fischer & Shaki, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%