Modeling, Design, and Optimization of Net‐Zero Energy Buildings 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9783433604625.ch03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comfort considerations in Net ZEBs: theory and design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we consider adaptive thermal comfort standards helpful, to take advantage of the individual range of adaptive possibilities in an nZEB. This could support the application of a range of passive cooling techniques in buildings as well as the satisfaction of occupants, in coherence with EN15251 and a range of national and international analysis [31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Thermal Comfort Limitsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In this study, we consider adaptive thermal comfort standards helpful, to take advantage of the individual range of adaptive possibilities in an nZEB. This could support the application of a range of passive cooling techniques in buildings as well as the satisfaction of occupants, in coherence with EN15251 and a range of national and international analysis [31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Thermal Comfort Limitsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, since the building is considered conditioned throughout the year, the Fanger thermal comfort model [37] is adopted to set suitable set-point operative temperatures for the heating and cooling periods [38,39]. For both periods, it is assumed that (i) the indoor operative temperature is calculated as the mean of the air and the mean radiant temperature, (ii) the external work of the occupants is zero, (iii) the occupants are in a sedentary activity 4 , so their metabolic rate is 1.2 met, (iv) the relative humidity is fixed at 50%, and (v) air speed is fixed at 0.1 m/s.…”
Section: Additional Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%