2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Come together: On-chip bioelectric wound closure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly relevant in the growing space of electroceuticals and bioelectronic interfaces being developed to augment large-scale, multicellular processes such as skin healing. Here, there is already striking data of the potential for electric fields to improve re-epithelialization in vitro ( 9 , 84 ) and in vivo ( 23 , 24 , 85–87 ). For instance, we previously demonstrated that closure of the classic in vitro ‘scratch wound’ can be accelerated by at least 2x in vitro using field stimulation ( 9 ), while direct electrical stimulation in vivo of zebrafish tail injuries improved the regeneration process ( 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is particularly relevant in the growing space of electroceuticals and bioelectronic interfaces being developed to augment large-scale, multicellular processes such as skin healing. Here, there is already striking data of the potential for electric fields to improve re-epithelialization in vitro ( 9 , 84 ) and in vivo ( 23 , 24 , 85–87 ). For instance, we previously demonstrated that closure of the classic in vitro ‘scratch wound’ can be accelerated by at least 2x in vitro using field stimulation ( 9 ), while direct electrical stimulation in vivo of zebrafish tail injuries improved the regeneration process ( 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Here, there is already striking data of the potential for electric fields to improve re-epithelialization in vitro ( 9 , 84 ) and in vivo ( 23 , 24 , 85–87 ). For instance, we previously demonstrated that closure of the classic in vitro ‘scratch wound’ can be accelerated by at least 2x in vitro using field stimulation ( 9 ), while direct electrical stimulation in vivo of zebrafish tail injuries improved the regeneration process ( 24 ). This is a highly interdisciplinary area of research, where there is an increasing need to investigate how stimulation affects general collective cellular responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[70][71][72] In the current state-of-the-art, the implementation of DCs still relies on metal electrodes and agar bridges as electrochemical buffers. Even though several research groups have managed to miniaturize and innovate the stimulation setup, [73,74] few groups address the persistent need for electrode materials that allow DCs to be applied directly in tissue. In this context, the use of CPs is a new approach with promising prospects for generating constant current stimulation in a biocompatible process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 It is only recently that there has been more focus on electrotaxis-mediated group migration. 24,25 For instance, Zajdel et al 26 showed that two patterned monolayers of keratinocytes, with a 1.5 mm gap, can be influenced by an EF stimulus (i.e., 200 mV mm −1 ) and close the gap between the two epithelial sheets twice as fast as compared to non-stimulated controls. This work set an important precedent, and calls for further translational efforts to make EF-accelerated repair accessible to patients who are at risk for chronic wounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%