2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Vis–NIR hyperspectral imagery and legacy measured soil profiles to map subsurface soil properties in a Mediterranean area (Cap-Bon, Tunisia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
4
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the model's performance, the results can be considered satisfactory; besides that, few studies in literature have used RF to predict soil CEC, and no one has used only remote sensing data as main covariates. The present results showed worst performance from statistical indexes when compared with those obtained by Lagacherie et al [61], which reached 79% for Var ex for the layer between 15 and 30 cm and 3.4 cmol c kg À1 for RMSE, using as input data terrain attributes and hyperspectral data in the visible and near infrared (AISA-Dual) with 5 m of spatial resolution. The difference from this study may be related to the coarser spatial resolution of images from Landsat 5 (30 m), in comparison with Lagacherie et al [61] who used hyperspectral data (5 m).…”
Section: Predictive Modelscontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the model's performance, the results can be considered satisfactory; besides that, few studies in literature have used RF to predict soil CEC, and no one has used only remote sensing data as main covariates. The present results showed worst performance from statistical indexes when compared with those obtained by Lagacherie et al [61], which reached 79% for Var ex for the layer between 15 and 30 cm and 3.4 cmol c kg À1 for RMSE, using as input data terrain attributes and hyperspectral data in the visible and near infrared (AISA-Dual) with 5 m of spatial resolution. The difference from this study may be related to the coarser spatial resolution of images from Landsat 5 (30 m), in comparison with Lagacherie et al [61] who used hyperspectral data (5 m).…”
Section: Predictive Modelscontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…The present results showed worst performance from statistical indexes when compared with those obtained by Lagacherie et al [61], which reached 79% for Var ex for the layer between 15 and 30 cm and 3.4 cmol c kg À1 for RMSE, using as input data terrain attributes and hyperspectral data in the visible and near infrared (AISA-Dual) with 5 m of spatial resolution. The difference from this study may be related to the coarser spatial resolution of images from Landsat 5 (30 m), in comparison with Lagacherie et al [61] who used hyperspectral data (5 m). The influence of spatial resolution in the prediction of soil properties is reported by other studies [62,63].…”
Section: Predictive Modelscontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Many scientists have used this method to carry out related studies [39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. These studies have indicated that this method can be used to obtain good estimation results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por exemplo, Nield et al (2007) utilizaram imagens do ETM+ Landsat 7 para mapear dois tipos de solos. A combinação de dados de sensoriamento remoto com dados de perfis de solos é ainda mais promissora, pois permite avaliar características subsuperficiais (Lagacherie et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified