Combining supervised run interval training or moderate-intensity continuous training with the diabetes prevention program on clinical outcomes

Gilbertson, Nicole M.; Mandelson, Joan A.; Hilovsky, Kathryn L.; Akers, Jeremy D.; Hargens, Trent A.; Wenos, David L.; Edwards, Elizabeth S.

doi:10.1007/s00421-019-04137-2

Cited by 9 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 807 participants in 29 studies [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ] were included in our meta-analysis. The primary characteristics of the participants and interventions are summarized in Table 2 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A total of 404 participants were allocated to the HIIT group, and 403 participants were allocated to the MICT group. A total of four studies [ 48 , 50 , 67 , 68 ] did not report sex ratio, the sex ratio of the remaining studies was 2:3. The participants in 20 included studies [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 63 , 66 , 68 , 69 ] were people with sedentary obesity, two studies [ 30 , 56 ] were sedentary only, and seven studies [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 50 , 62 , 64 , 67 ] were other medical comorbidities (two Type 1 diabetes, two Type 2 diabetes, one prediabetes, one polycystic ovary syndrome, and one fibromyalgia).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Out of all interventions, most exercise forms were cycling, six studies [ 47 , 49 , 50 , 63 , 66 , 69 ] used running, two studies [ 48 , 51 ] used home-based HIIT for HIIT and running for MICT, and one study [ 44 ] used boxing for HIIT and walking for MICT. The duration of 13 studies [ 44 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 51 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 58 , 63 , 66 , 67 , 69 ] was 3 months, only two studies [ 42 , 50 ] adopted >3 months intervention. Most interventions used HRmax or VO 2peak to measure the intensity of exercise, two studies [ 44 , 50 ] used RPE, three studies [ 45 , 59 , 60 ] used Wpeak or Wmax, six studies [ 46 , 48 , 52 , 56 , 57 , 61 , 64 ] used all-out exercise or maximum effort.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The duration of 13 studies [ 44 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 51 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 58 , 63 , 66 , 67 , 69 ] was 3 months, only two studies [ 42 , 50 ] adopted >3 months intervention. Most interventions used HRmax or VO 2peak to measure the intensity of exercise, two studies [ 44 , 50 ] used RPE, three studies [ 45 , 59 , 60 ] used Wpeak or Wmax, six studies [ 46 , 48 , 52 , 56 , 57 , 61 , 64 ] used all-out exercise or maximum effort. A total of 10 HIIT interventions used passive recovery [ 44 , 48 , 51 , 53 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 61 , 64 , 69 ] and the remaining used active recovery.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Fat Loss and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Young and Middle-Aged a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Guo

Cai

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This systematic review is conducted to evaluate the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in the young and middle-aged. Methods: Seven databases were searched from their inception to 22 October 2022 for studies (randomized controlled trials only) with HIIT and MICT intervention. Meta-analysis was carried out for within-group (pre-intervention vs. post-intervention) and between-group (HIIT vs. MICT) comparisons for change in body mass (BM), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), percent fat mass (PFM), fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), and CRF. Results: A total of 1738 studies were retrieved from the database, and 29 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Within-group analyses indicated that both HIIT and MICT can bring significant improvement in body composition and CRF, except for FFM. Between-group analyses found that compared to MICT, HIIT brings significant benefits to WC, PFM, and VO2peak. Conclusions: The effect of HIIT on fat loss and CRF in the young and middle-aged is similar to or better than MICT, which might be influenced by age (18–45 years), complications (obesity), duration (>6 weeks), frequency, and HIIT interval. Despite the clinical significance of the improvement being limited, HIIT appears to be more time-saving and enjoyable than MICT.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Fat Loss and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Young and Middle-Aged a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Guo

Cai

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Efficacy of high-intensity interval- or continuous aerobic-training on insulin resistance and muscle function in adults with metabolic syndrome: a clinical trial

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Implementation and Outcome of Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention in High Risk or Prediabetes: A Review of the Literature

Ningsih,

Pandin,

Efendy

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundEffective lifestyle intervention can lower Type 2 diabetes mellitus in high-risk or prediabetic people through diabetes mellitus prevention programmes. The aim of this review of the research is to provide an explanation of how diabetes prevention programmes (DPP) are implemented in high-risk people or those with prediabetes using a variety of DPP methods and results.MethodThe method used is a literature review by searching for relevant peer-reviewed articles published in English in three databases: Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL. Studies assessing the use of diabetes mellitus preventive programmes in high-risk people or people with prediabetes were the inclusion criteria for this review. Individuals with prediabetes or high risk were among the subjects. The main result is the outcome of the DPP. Literature search is limited to publications in 2018–2023 and open access.Result18 articles in all were reviewed.The main focus of DPP-based lifestyle interventions is dietary and physical activity. Health education and behaviour change strategies are also included in lifestyle interventions. The implementation of nutrition or dietary interventions can be provided face-to-face on a group-based basis for an average of 6–12 months and online through intensive interventions with weekly online modules through web-based platforms, text messaging, and digital therapy. The implementation of diet and physical activity interventions needs support from families or groups to be able to make healthy behaviour changes, one of which is peer support. The short-term effects of DPP are decreased waist circumference, plasma glucose levels, increased knowledge, diet, and physical activity. The long-term consequences of DPP include weight loss with a lowered risk of developing diabetes, modifications to lipid profiles, enhanced pancreatic cell function, increased insulin sensitivity, decreased body fat mass, and HbA1C.ConclusionDiabetes mellitus prevention programme through effective lifestyle interventions to slow the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus in prediabetic individuals

show abstract

Combining supervised run interval training or moderate-intensity continuous training with the diabetes prevention program on clinical outcomes

Cited by 9 publications

References 39 publications

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Fat Loss and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Young and Middle-Aged a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Fat Loss and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Young and Middle-Aged a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of high-intensity interval- or continuous aerobic-training on insulin resistance and muscle function in adults with metabolic syndrome: a clinical trial

The Implementation and Outcome of Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention in High Risk or Prediabetes: A Review of the Literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About