2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6cc02542k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining solid-state NMR spectroscopy with first-principles calculations – a guide to NMR crystallography

Abstract: Recent advances in the application of first-principles calculations of NMR parameters to periodic systems have resulted in widespread interest in their use to support experimental measurement. Such calculations often play an important role in the emerging field of "NMR crystallography", where NMR spectroscopy is combined with techniques such as diffraction, to aid structure determination. Here, we discuss the current state-of-the-art for combining experiment and calculation in NMR spectroscopy, considering the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
300
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
9
300
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One crucial requirement for the prediction of accurate NMR parameters from a given structure is that the structure itself must represent a realistic minimum on the energy landscape. 17,47,49,50 In order to ensure this is the case, the atomic coordinates and, often, unit cell parameters can (or, indeed, must) be optimised to an energy minimum. Sneddon et al 50 recently investigated the computational parameters most suited to the optimisation of AlPOs and showed that the optimisation of all atomic coordinates and unit cell parameters with the inclusion of semi-empirical dispersion correction schemes yielded results in good agreement with both crystallographic and spectroscopic measurements, without applying any a priori constraints to the structural model.…”
Section: Dft Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One crucial requirement for the prediction of accurate NMR parameters from a given structure is that the structure itself must represent a realistic minimum on the energy landscape. 17,47,49,50 In order to ensure this is the case, the atomic coordinates and, often, unit cell parameters can (or, indeed, must) be optimised to an energy minimum. Sneddon et al 50 recently investigated the computational parameters most suited to the optimisation of AlPOs and showed that the optimisation of all atomic coordinates and unit cell parameters with the inclusion of semi-empirical dispersion correction schemes yielded results in good agreement with both crystallographic and spectroscopic measurements, without applying any a priori constraints to the structural model.…”
Section: Dft Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,17-19, [46][47][48][49] As most of the forms of as-made AlPO-34 considered here have crystal structures refined with disorder of the SDA (emim and cyclam), 29,30,34 water (pyr) 31 or both (pip), 32 DFT calculations were used to help interpret and assign the experimental NMR spectra. One crucial requirement for the prediction of accurate NMR parameters from a given structure is that the structure itself must represent a realistic minimum on the energy landscape.…”
Section: Dft Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the numbering scheme used for pur is not that typically used in organic chemistry, but has been chosen to facilitate comparison with other linkers. [11] GME nIm þ nbIm YOZBIZ assignment of spectra [24,25]. While extremely valuable in many cases, this can prove challenging if there are a large number of distinct atoms in the unit cell (as is the case for many ZIFs) or if there is significant disorder and/or dynamics of the linkers, functional groups or incorporated solvent/guest molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 The wide applications of PAW-based calculations to "NMR crystallography" are well documented. [45][46][47] The PAW methodology has been used several times for the calculation of chlorine NMR parameters. 21, 24-25, 28-29, 48 However, the performance for the prediction of EFG tensor parameters for ionic systems is low relative to covalent systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%