2003
DOI: 10.1080/02687030344000454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining lexical and interactional approaches to therapy for word finding deficits in aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the elusive finding of generalized improvement in word retrieval skills, for example, as indicated by greater accuracy scores on treated and untreated sets of target words, has been the exception rather than the rule in published studies. 26 This has led to several studies in which the primary goal has been improved reliability of production for purposefully trained items, for example, usually vocabulary items, which are agreed to be communicatively relevant to an individual participant, 5,[27][28][29] where generalized improvement in word retrieval skills was taken to be a possible but not a probable therapy outcome. Such studies have negotiated target words for training on the basis of likely everyday use in conversation or general interaction; proper names of family members and friends are one example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the elusive finding of generalized improvement in word retrieval skills, for example, as indicated by greater accuracy scores on treated and untreated sets of target words, has been the exception rather than the rule in published studies. 26 This has led to several studies in which the primary goal has been improved reliability of production for purposefully trained items, for example, usually vocabulary items, which are agreed to be communicatively relevant to an individual participant, 5,[27][28][29] where generalized improvement in word retrieval skills was taken to be a possible but not a probable therapy outcome. Such studies have negotiated target words for training on the basis of likely everyday use in conversation or general interaction; proper names of family members and friends are one example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los principales métodos desarrollados con aplicación concreta en Lingüística Clínica son los que adoptan la perspectiva etnográfica e interaccional y el análisis del discurso y conversacional (Kirk y Miller, 1886;Codesido, 1997;Damico et al, 1999;Simmons-Mackie y Damico, 2001;Herbert et al, 2003;Perkins, 2005;Damico y Ball, 2008;Müller et al, 2008;Wilkinson, 2008).…”
Section: Metodología Cuantitativa Y Cualitativa Para La Recogida Y Anunclassified
“…The majority of studies treating nouns with a lexical therapy have not measured effects on connected speech. Exceptions are Herbert, Best, Hickin, Osborne & Howard, 2003;Hickin et al (2007), Peach andReuter (2009), Greenwood, Grassley, Hickin &, and Best, Grassley, Greenwood, et al (2011), which attempted to track changes in conversation or connected speech. Findings to date are mixed, for example Best et al (2011) found no improvement in conversation for around half of the participants.…”
Section: Lexical Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach addresses noun retrieval in an interactional or a discourse context, in an attempt to bridge the gap between the task used in therapy of associating words with pictures, and the everyday function of retrieving nouns in spontaneous speech (e.g. Greenwood et al, 2010;Herbert et al, 2003;Hickin et al, 2007;Peach & Reuter, 2009). …”
Section: Alternatives To Lexical Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%