2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining in situ flow cytometry and artificial neural networks for aquatic systems monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3(a), for example, presents the clusters of real time data of phytoplankton cells acquired by the CytoBuoy instrument since the red fluorescence signals are the results of chlorophyll-a response to the laser excitation and the side scatter (SSC) is proportional to cytoplasmic granularity of a cell or internal complexity measurement [60]. Individuals of these groups were better characterized by [39] at a single cell and species level. During the studied period, the total phytoplankton concentration varied from 3.30 × 10 2 cells/ml in the winter to 8.66 × 10 2 cells/ml in the summer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3(a), for example, presents the clusters of real time data of phytoplankton cells acquired by the CytoBuoy instrument since the red fluorescence signals are the results of chlorophyll-a response to the laser excitation and the side scatter (SSC) is proportional to cytoplasmic granularity of a cell or internal complexity measurement [60]. Individuals of these groups were better characterized by [39] at a single cell and species level. During the studied period, the total phytoplankton concentration varied from 3.30 × 10 2 cells/ml in the winter to 8.66 × 10 2 cells/ml in the summer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data-driven modelling tools can be useful in dynamic ecosystems where changing trophic conditions and complex non-linear interactions are expected. Such mo-dels have been used to predict aquatic community abundances [33][34][35][36] or biological pattern recognition [37][38][39]. However, if a neural network is too small, it may never be able to learn the desired function and thus produces unacceptably larger errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional (i.e., not automated) microscopic analysis is extremely labor intensive and time consuming, which strongly limits the throughput of samples. This way, it is not suitable for the high-frequency monitoring of phytoplankton communities as required in modern day field applications (Walker and Kumagai 2000;Embleton et al 2003;Culverhouse 2007;Pereira and Ebecken 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence intensity provides information on the fluorescent pigments produced by the cells, whereas the degree of scatter is correlated to the size of the cell (forward scattering) and the cell's granularity or internal complexity (90° light scattering or side scattering). This allows the automated classification of planktonic cells into functional groups, but does not typically allow identification at lower taxonomic levels (Rutten et al 2005;Pereira and Ebecken 2011). Yet, the strength of flow cytometry is its ability to rapidly and automatically analyze many populations of cells (Rutten et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these instruments produced substantial amounts of data. In this context, models based on cytometric signatures have been successfully developed and applied (Embleton et al, 2003;Kenneth et al, 2008;Pereira and Ebecken, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%