Combining cognitive bias modification training with motivational support in alcohol dependent outpatients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundAddiction research has hypothesised that automatic and reflective cognitive processes play an important role in the onset and maintenance of alcohol (ab)use, wherein automatic reactions to drug-related cues steer the drug user towards consuming before reflective processes can get over and steer towards a different behavioural response. These automatic processes include the tendency to attend and approach alcohol cues. These biases may be trained away from alcohol via computerised cognitive bias modification (CBM). The present protocol describes the design of a double-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing the effectiveness of attentional bias and approach bias re-training with a 2×2 factorial design, alongside a brief motivational support (MS) program.Methods/DesignParticipants (n = 120) are adult alcohol dependent outpatients, recruited from a public health service for addiction in Italy, who have been abstinent for at least two months, and with a main diagnosis of alcohol dependence disorder. Participants are randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions and complete 11 sessions of training after a baseline assessment. The MS takes place before each training session. Post-intervention and three-month follow-up assessments examine the change in clinical outcome variables and attentional and approach biases (measured with the Visual Probe Task and the Approach-Avoidance Task, respectively). Alcohol approach-avoidance implicit memory associations (measured with the Brief Implicit Association Test) are also evaluated at pre- and post-intervention to explore generalisation effects. Primary outcome measure is relapse rate at follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include change in cognitive biases, in alcohol-related implicit memory associations, and in the clinical variables assessed. An exploratory analysis is also planned to detect interaction effects between the CBM modules and possible moderators (interference control capacity, gender, age, number of previous detoxifications) and mediators (change in cognitive bias) of the primary outcome measure.DiscussionThis RCT is the first to test the effectiveness of a combined CBM intervention alongside motivational support in alcohol-dependent outpatients. The results of this study can be extremely valuable for future research in the optimisation of CBM treatment for alcohol addiction.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN01005959 (registration date: 24 October 2013).Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0576-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Validation of the Amsterdam Beverage Picture Set: A Controlled Picture Set for Cognitive Bias Measurement and Modification Paradigms

“…The ABPS (Van Deursen et al., 2013) and its Italian version (Boffo et al., 2015) are currently being used in a cognitive bias measurement and modification study, allowing current findings to be compared with measures of implicit cognition. Furthermore, these studies may answer whether noncontextualized pictures are indeed are most effective to measure and train cognitive biases.…”

The efficacy of attention bias modification therapy in cocaine use disorders

“…Thus, although unlikely (57), it is possible that a single session of motivational interviewing influenced both baseline measures of bias and washed out the therapeutic effects of ABMT relative to control therapy. Importantly, future studies are needed to determine how different motivational therapies may interact with ABMT (58). Previous research has reported ABMT efficacy with five (21) or fewer (19) brief interventions.…”

Cognitive Bias Modification for adolescents with substance use problems – Can serious games help?

“…Third, we should perhaps more clearly differentiate between the two aforementioned types of motivation involved in CBM. Besides having a motivation to change one's behavior (e.g., maladaptive substance use), there is a related, but separate, motivation to complete a potentially tedious multi-session training in order to do so (Boffo, Pronk, Wiers, & Mannarini, 2015). While it remains unclear whether one needs both in order for CBM to be effective, participants may still need at least some degree of an intrinsic motivation to change their behavior in order for CBM to have any effect Wiers, Houben, et al, 2015).…”