Validation of the Amsterdam Beverage Picture Set: A Controlled Picture Set for Cognitive Bias Measurement and Modification Paradigms

Abstract

BackgroundAlcohol research may benefit from controlled and validated picture sets. We have constructed the Amsterdam Beverage Picture Set (ABPS), which was designed for alcohol research in general and cognitive bias measurement and modification in particular. Here, we first formulate a position on alcohol stimulus validity that prescribes that alcohol‐containing pictures, compared to nonalcohol‐containing pictures, should induce a stronger urge to drink in heavy drinkers than in light drinkers. Because a perceptually simple picture might induce stronger cognitive biases but the presence of a drinking context might induce a stronger urge to drink, the ABPS contains pictures with and without drinking context. By limiting drinking contexts to simple consumption scenes instead of real‐life scenes, complexity was minimized. A validation study was conducted to establish validity, to examine ABPS drinking contexts, and to explore the role of familiarity, valence, arousal, and control.MethodsTwo hundred ninety‐one psychology students completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, as well as rating and recognition tasks for a subset of the ABPS pictures.ResultsThe ABPS was well‐recognized, familiar, and heavy drinkers reported a greater urge to drink in response to the alcohol‐containing pictures only. Alcohol presented in drinking context did not elicit a stronger urge to drink but was recognized more slowly than alcohol presented without context.ConclusionsThe ABPS was found to be valid, although pictures without context might be preferable for measuring cognitive biases than pictures with context. We discuss how an explicit approach to picture construction may aid in creating variations of the ABPS. Finally, we describe how ABPS adoption across studies may allow more reproducible and comparable results across paradigms, while allowing researchers to apply picture selection criteria that correspond to a wide range of theoretical positions. The latter is exemplified by ABPS derivatives and adoptions that are currently under way.

Attentional Bias Modification With Serious Game Elements: Evaluating the Shots Game

“…All picture pairs were matched by size and colors (see Figure 1). All stimuli originated from the Amsterdam Beverage Picture Set (ABPS [33]). Attentional bias scores for Stay and Go trials were computed by respectively subtracting the average reaction time for correct trials with the arrow at the location of the alcoholic picture from the average reaction time on correct trials where the arrow was at the location of the nonalcoholic picture.…”

A Newly Designed Mobile-Based Computerized Cognitive Addiction Therapy App for the Improvement of Cognition Impairments and Risk Decision Making in Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

“…Therefore, we designed a mobile based App program called cognition addiction therapy (CAT) by combining cognitive training and cognitive bias modification. Furthermore, studies have showed that enhanced drug-related choice can be demonstrated even for pictorial stimuli [25], with simple passive pictures might induce stronger cognitive biases while active pictures presenting drug use related context might induce a stronger urge for drugs [26]. MA use related pictures were integrated into the App programs, aiming to address both cognitive impairment and cognitive bias in MUD patients.…”

Development of stimulus material for research in alcohol use disorders

“…Borrowing from the definition of test validity by Borsboom, Mellenbergh, and Van Heerden (), and translating these considerations to the concept of stimulus validity (Pronk, van Deursen, Beraha, Larsen, & Wiers, ), stimuli would be considered as valid “if variations in the stimuli causally produce variations in the attribute” under investigation (Pronk et al, , p. 2048). For instance, since we want the stimuli to activate addiction‐related concepts (such as memory contents) and provoke addiction‐related responses (e.g.…”