2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining a typology and a conceptual model of cropping system to explore the diversity of relationships between ecosystem services: The case of erosion control in coffee-based agroforestry systems in Costa Rica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The municipality of Terra Roxa exhibited the lowest monthly variation between Q1 (Quartile 1) and Q3, especially in July, with a variation of 43 mm. By contrast, this municipality had the highest concentration of outliers (13) and extremes (5). Toledo exhibited the largest variation between quartiles, in May, with a difference of 202 and 566 mm between the maximum and minimum values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The municipality of Terra Roxa exhibited the lowest monthly variation between Q1 (Quartile 1) and Q3, especially in July, with a variation of 43 mm. By contrast, this municipality had the highest concentration of outliers (13) and extremes (5). Toledo exhibited the largest variation between quartiles, in May, with a difference of 202 and 566 mm between the maximum and minimum values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Soil particle distribution was 47% ± 3.1 clay, 30% ± 2.3 silt and 23% ± 5.0 sand at a depth of 10 cm and 40% ± 5.3 clay, 30% ± 1.2 silt and 29% ± 6.2 sand at a depth of 40 cm (Meylan et al, 2013). The average soil bulk density was 1.35 ± 0.08 g cm À3 for the first 30 cm in depth (Nespoulous, 2011).…”
Section: Plot Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Building a conceptual model is meant to be complementary to this descriptive process: The variables describing the state of the system need to be chosen; the relationships between them, with the outputs (ecosystem services) and with the factors (environment, practices) that determine them, need to be described. The conceptual model presents and makes explicit our implicit understanding of the system, coming, at least partly, from academic knowledge and can be used to test hypotheses and explore scenarios (Meylan et al 2013). Obviously, the statistical description of the cropping systems, their performance and, hopefully, some state variables will then be required to test the validity of the relationships that were included, in a way similar to agronomic analysis (Rapidel et al 2006).…”
Section: Trade-off Analysis For the Design Of Cropping Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%