2010 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icmlc.2010.5580672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining a large sentiment lexicon and machine learning for subjectivity classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning approach produced high accuracy due to its high-quality training data. However, the performance drops when the same classifier is implemented in a different domain [27]. In contrast, lexicon based approach can be implemented in various domains, but slightly less accurate to machine learning approach.…”
Section: B Lexicon-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning approach produced high accuracy due to its high-quality training data. However, the performance drops when the same classifier is implemented in a different domain [27]. In contrast, lexicon based approach can be implemented in various domains, but slightly less accurate to machine learning approach.…”
Section: B Lexicon-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML algorithms are commonly used for their simplicity and domain adaptability since it has the ability to learn from the training data. On the other hand, Lexicon-based algorithms are also frequently used to tackle general SA issues because they are scalable and computationally efficient [20,39,58]. Moreover, the choice of the subjectivity detection algorithm could effectively improve the overall performance of sentiment classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining large size of training data annotated by experts is difficult, and sometimes human judgment of the sentiment expressed in text is not as accurate as an automated approach. To overcome these difficulties, recently there were reports that combined both techniques (Lu &Tsou, 2010;Tan et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%