2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining a growth-simulation model with acoustic-wood tomography as a decision-support tool for adaptive management and conservation of forest ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Predicting future forest dynamics in stand-scale is an essential component of sustainable forest management (Thurnher et al 2017). The general shift from forest management aimed at pure forest stands (coniferous monoculture) to sustainable forest management aimed at multifunctional uneven-aged mixed-species forests requires modern tools for yield projections which predict future stand development for different management regimes, including conservation targets (Simon et al 2015). As a result, single-tree growth simulators have been developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting future forest dynamics in stand-scale is an essential component of sustainable forest management (Thurnher et al 2017). The general shift from forest management aimed at pure forest stands (coniferous monoculture) to sustainable forest management aimed at multifunctional uneven-aged mixed-species forests requires modern tools for yield projections which predict future stand development for different management regimes, including conservation targets (Simon et al 2015). As a result, single-tree growth simulators have been developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific anthropogenic processes result in anthropogenic landforms (e.g., quarries, pits, communication cuttings and underground landforms) that can be considered important from the 2 of 16 scientific, educational, cultural, historical, environmental and tourism point of view [13][14][15]. These landforms have multiple functions: -They can be seen as elements that increase the overall landscape diversity [16] and positively influence biodiversity [17,18], especially disused quarries and flooded pits); -They provide information about landscape changes and modifications made in the past, and these can be an important resource for understanding the cultural and technical level of a society [19,20]; -They support an ecosystem service provisioning [21]; -They allow us to trace the use of geodiversity in the past and interpret cultural heritage in relation to abiotic nature [22], including the involvement of local communities [23,24] based on applying of historical ecology [25]; -They possess the potential for developing sustainable forms of tourism (or geotourism), which can positively affect local economic development [26,27]-they can be visually attractive [28] or allow us to interpret the technical aspects of using geodiversity resources, e.g., mining and industrial tourism [29,30]; -They allow us to observe stratigraphical, tectonic, palaeopedological and other Earth science features that would normally remain hidden and unrecorded in the literature or on geological maps [31,32] and the information can be used in both formal and informal education, and it is important from the conservation point of view [33]; -Landforms can be considered as an important stepping stones for biological species sensitive to fragmentation of landscape [34,35]; -Specific anthropogenic landforms form an inseparable part of items of cultural heritage, e.g., earth fortifications and ramparts and irrigation channels [36,37]; -In urban areas, the anthropogenic landforms allow us to interpret urban development [38] and they are an inseparable component of urban landscapes [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of 59 breeding bird species in the study area of LPPLA reflects the current knowledge related to the high diversity of bird communities in temperate hardwood floodplain forests in North America [49,50] and Europe [51,52]. Our results relating to the dominance of bird species in HFF (Table 3) are in accordance with our studies published earlier [53,54], which indicated that the dominant bird species are common birds in European lowland cultural landscapes, but some species are of conservation concern-e.g., F. albicollis is a bird species in the focus of the Bird Directive under Natura 2000 [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%