2000
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Transvaginal B-Mode and Color Doppler Sonography for Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors: Results of a Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither B-mode morphological scoring systems [17][18][19][20][21] nor Doppler quantitative analysis [22,23] was used to evaluate the ovaries. All study investigators performed a simple descriptive assessment of the presence or absence of arterial vessels, septa, unilocular or multilocular cysts within the mass, following the previously published guidelines [24][25][26][27][28] for ultrasound classification of ovaries. Based on that descriptive analysis alone, investigators were asked to classify each ovary seen as positive (malignant) or negative (benign) for malignancy.…”
Section: Tvs and Ovhs Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither B-mode morphological scoring systems [17][18][19][20][21] nor Doppler quantitative analysis [22,23] was used to evaluate the ovaries. All study investigators performed a simple descriptive assessment of the presence or absence of arterial vessels, septa, unilocular or multilocular cysts within the mass, following the previously published guidelines [24][25][26][27][28] for ultrasound classification of ovaries. Based on that descriptive analysis alone, investigators were asked to classify each ovary seen as positive (malignant) or negative (benign) for malignancy.…”
Section: Tvs and Ovhs Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood flow data should be considered to indicate the angiogenic intensity of a tumor, rather than indicating malignancy itself. [10][11][12] It seems clear that initial attempts to classify ovarian tumors solely on the basis of their impedance to blood flow have been too simplistic. This problem has been partly solved by the introduction of other 'vascular parameters' such as blood vessel arrangement and location, shape of the pulsed Doppler waveform and appearance of an early diastolic notch, as well as assessment of blood flow velocities.…”
Section: Angiogenesis In Malignant Ovarian Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors, however, point out that the most important variable in predicting malignancy is the presence or absence of solid elements within the tumor, and find that the use of 3D transvaginal sonography does not significantly improve the 2D transvaginal sonographic morphologic assessment of complex adnexal masses, though it is useful for reinforcing initial diagnostic impressions. [19][20][21] Concerning power Doppler evaluation of complex adnexal masses, Cohen et al published a study over 71 women in which despite all malignancies were correctly identified by both 2D and 3D imaging, the specificity was significantly improved with the addition of 3D power Doppler.…”
Section: New Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%