2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1750-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new computer-aided diagnostic tool for non-invasive characterisation of malignant ovarian masses: results of a multicentre validation study

Olivier Lucidarme,
Jean-Paul Akakpo,
Seth Granberg
et al.

Abstract: Computer-aided quantification of backscattered ultrasound is a highly sensitive for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian masses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 US, CT, or magnetic resonance imaging can provide important information about the malignant potential of pelvic masses. [3][4][5] If a tissue diagnosis is preferred, however, percutaneous biopsy in this region may be difficult because of possible vital intervening structures. 6 EUS is a potentially useful modality to diagnose pelvic lesions in close proximity to the rectosigmoid colon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 US, CT, or magnetic resonance imaging can provide important information about the malignant potential of pelvic masses. [3][4][5] If a tissue diagnosis is preferred, however, percutaneous biopsy in this region may be difficult because of possible vital intervening structures. 6 EUS is a potentially useful modality to diagnose pelvic lesions in close proximity to the rectosigmoid colon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An innovative CAD technology that quantifies characteristic features of backscattered US and theoretically allows transvaginal sonography (TVS) to discriminate benign from malignant adnexal masses was proposed. 57 This method correctly identified 138 of 141 malignant lesions and 206 of 234 nonmalignant tissues (98% sensitivity and 88% specificity) with an accuracy of 91.73%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This CAD technology has been tested in clinical trials aimed to distinguish benign from malignant tissue in the breast and the ovary, but its widespread clinical use has not been adopted for these tissues [10][11][12]. According to published data, it has the potential to predict cancer lesion location within the prostate at 90% sensitivity and 72% specificity for tumors that are more than 0.2 cm 3 in volume compared to RP specimens [1,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%