2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined SRPK and AKT pharmacological inhibition is synergistic in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, rather unexpectedly pharmacological inhibition of SRPK1 did not interfere with AKT signalling in endometrial cancer cells, with the authors suggesting a feedback loop may be present within the pathway [31]. A similar finding was illustrated in T-ALL cell lines where combined AKT/SRPK1 inhibition was required to impede AKT/PI3K signalling [74]. In contrast SRPK1 inhibition alone is sufficient to interfere with AKT signalling in many other cancers [25,32,37,67,68,70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, rather unexpectedly pharmacological inhibition of SRPK1 did not interfere with AKT signalling in endometrial cancer cells, with the authors suggesting a feedback loop may be present within the pathway [31]. A similar finding was illustrated in T-ALL cell lines where combined AKT/SRPK1 inhibition was required to impede AKT/PI3K signalling [74]. In contrast SRPK1 inhibition alone is sufficient to interfere with AKT signalling in many other cancers [25,32,37,67,68,70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Interestingly SRPK1 inhibition alone was not found to effect cell apoptosis in this study, rather synergistic treatment alongside an AKT inhibitor was found to have a significant effect on apoptosis. This suggests the likely presence of a regulatory feedback loop within the signalling cascade in this cell type [74].…”
Section: Leukaemiamentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown that inhibition of the protein kinase SRPK1 reduces phosphorylation of the splicing factors SRSF1 and SRSF2, resulting in significant splicing dysregulation in AML cells. Importantly, the SRPK1-dependent phosphorylation of splicing factor SRSF1 in Y19 was defined as a specific diagnostic marker of some AML patients [ 318 , 319 , 320 ]. Additionally, the altered splicing was detected in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells due to enhanced phosphorylation of splicing factor SRSF5 in S250 [ 321 ].…”
Section: Defects In Splicing and Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esses achados estão de acordo com os de outros estudos, onde compostos sintetizados inspirados no SRPIN340 também mostraram citotoxicidade significativa contra células de glioblastoma, melanoma e leucemia (MOREIRA et al, 2018;SOUSA et al, 2021;SIQUEIRA et al, 2017). Essa maior citotoxicidade dos compostos análogos a SRPIN340 pode ter relação com a já relatada baixa potência de SRPIN340, conforme vista em estudos anteriores (GAMMONS et al, 2014;SIQUEIRA et al, 2020). Além disso, sugere-se que os compostos análogos podem ter uma maior ação inibitória de SRPK, já que esta transferase está envolvida na resistência citotóxica de células tumorais a terapias anticâncer através da evasão da apoptose celular, além de também contribuir com a viabilidade celular (DONG et al, 2022;HUANG et al, 2021;ODUNSI et al, 2012) A expressão elevada e atividade de SRPK1 é causa de desfechos não favoráveis em câncer de mama, como metástases, mau prognóstico clínico, fuga da apoptose celular, resistência a tratamentos anticâncer, recorrência da doença, além de menor sobrevida (LI et al, 2014;LIN et al, 2014;MALVI et al, 2020;van ROOSMALEN et al, 2015;WANG et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified