2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/797846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Orthodontic and Surgical Approach in the Correction of a Class III Skeletal Malocclusion with Mandibular Prognathism and Vertical Maxillary Excess Using Bimaxillary Osteotomy

Abstract: For patients whose orthodontic problems are so severe that neither growth modification nor camouflage offers a solution, surgery to realign the jaws or reposition dentoalveolar segments is the only possible treatment. Surgery is not a substitute for orthodontics in these patients. Instead, it must be properly coordinated with orthodontics and other dental treatments to achieve good overall results. Dramatic progress in recent years has made it possible for combined surgical orthodontic treatment to be carried … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Referring to Eckhardt & Cherackal [1,20] bimaxillary osteotomy, comparing to one-jaw osteotomies, offers a greater potential to modify anterior face height, what is heard on the soft tissues. This is why it's justified in patients, such as in this case, in the aim to improve excessive vertical dimension of the lower face [1,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Referring to Eckhardt & Cherackal [1,20] bimaxillary osteotomy, comparing to one-jaw osteotomies, offers a greater potential to modify anterior face height, what is heard on the soft tissues. This is why it's justified in patients, such as in this case, in the aim to improve excessive vertical dimension of the lower face [1,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to Eckhardt & Cherackal [1,20] bimaxillary osteotomy, comparing to one-jaw osteotomies, offers a greater potential to modify anterior face height, what is heard on the soft tissues. This is why it's justified in patients, such as in this case, in the aim to improve excessive vertical dimension of the lower face [1,20]. Clinical success after orthognathic therapy can be defined as a combination of following factors: patient (and patient's family) satisfaction, Correct static and functional occlusion, patient comfort when chewing no pain in the temporomandibular joint and stability of the result in long term [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selected patients were divided equally into two groups, 12 patients each; Group A patients underwent mandibular set-back surgery in the form of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) surgery, while group B patients had Bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in the form of le fort I maxillary advancement with mandibular set-back BSSO surgery utilizing typical documented methodology (18,19) . (Fig.…”
Section: Preoperative Preparation and Patient Groupingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orthognathic surgery is a procedure that aims at improvement of masticatory function, esthetic harmony and structural balance [1,3,4]. The first Le Fort I osteotomy for correction of malocclusion was introduced by Wassmund in 1927.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%