2022
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01659-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma: a randomised, open label, phase 2 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Despite extensive (pre)clinical data that demonstrate the radiosensitizing properties of chemotherapeutic drugs, the intolerable side effects of chemotherapy are clinically limiting its applications. [4][5][6] Nanoparticles containing high-Z elements, such as Au nanoparticles, [7][8][9][10][11] Bi(III) chalcogenides, [12][13][14][15] and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), [16][17][18][19][20] have recently been used as radiosensitizers. While these inorganic nanomaterials provide large X-ray absorption cross-sections that amplify the radiation energy deposited in tumor tissue and improve radiobiological effects, their biosafety has been questioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Despite extensive (pre)clinical data that demonstrate the radiosensitizing properties of chemotherapeutic drugs, the intolerable side effects of chemotherapy are clinically limiting its applications. [4][5][6] Nanoparticles containing high-Z elements, such as Au nanoparticles, [7][8][9][10][11] Bi(III) chalcogenides, [12][13][14][15] and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), [16][17][18][19][20] have recently been used as radiosensitizers. While these inorganic nanomaterials provide large X-ray absorption cross-sections that amplify the radiation energy deposited in tumor tissue and improve radiobiological effects, their biosafety has been questioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective study conducted in Germany observed responses to IPI/NIVO in three out of five anti‐PD‐L1 treatment refractory patients, without grade II or III IRAEs 37 . In addition, a recently publishedrandomized, open label, phase 2 clinical trial (NCT03071406) enrolled advanced stage MCC patients who were either treatment naïve or had received prior anti‐PD‐1 or anti‐PD‐L1 monotherapy to study the effects of IPI/NIVO with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) 38 . The primary endpoint was the ORR (proportion of patients with a CR or PR) in all randomly assigned patients receiving at least one dose of IPI/NIVO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not yet FDA‐approved, Nivolumab, a PD‐1 inhibitor has also shown efficacy in treating advanced MCC. Most recently, combination IPI/NIVO has also demonstrated clinical efficacy as a first line for advanced MCC 38 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the just published randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial on first-line IPI/NIVO±stereotactic body radiation with an impressive ORR of 100% in ICI-naïve patients now gives justified reason to possibly even prefer IPI/NIVO as first-line therapy over PD-L1 or PD-1 monotherapy. 13 Clinical characteristics and other biomarkers might predict response to immunotherapies. MCC shows a particular biology with MCPyV being integrated into ~70% of the tumor genomes, while the remaining 30% presumably are linked to UV irradiation showing a strikingly high tumor mutational burden (TMB).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%