2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined nerve, vessel, and tendon injuries of the volar wrist: Multidisciplinary treatment and functional outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these two groups of patients had injuries at different segments of the forearm, which indicated different reconstruction strategies against tendon or muscle laceration and different rehabilitation programs, with at least one major artery and one major nerve involved, a significant difference was only observed in surgical time (1.8±0.4 h to 2.1±0.4 h, t=2.455, p=0.018) (Table IV) and grip strength at the final follow-up (χ 2 =7.557, p=0.023) (Table V) between the wrist injury group and forearm injury group under the same rehabilitation program as described by Boynuyogun et al[ 6 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although these two groups of patients had injuries at different segments of the forearm, which indicated different reconstruction strategies against tendon or muscle laceration and different rehabilitation programs, with at least one major artery and one major nerve involved, a significant difference was only observed in surgical time (1.8±0.4 h to 2.1±0.4 h, t=2.455, p=0.018) (Table IV) and grip strength at the final follow-up (χ 2 =7.557, p=0.023) (Table V) between the wrist injury group and forearm injury group under the same rehabilitation program as described by Boynuyogun et al[ 6 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Although these two groups of patients had injuries at different segments of the forearm, which indicated different reconstruction strategies against tendon or muscle laceration and different rehabilitation programs, with at least one major artery and one major nerve involved, a significant difference was only observed in surgical time (1.8±0.4 h to 2.1±0.4 h, t=2.455, p=0.018) (Table IV) and grip strength at the final follow-up (c 2 =7.557, p=0.023) (Table V) between the wrist injury group and forearm injury group under the same rehabilitation program as described by Boynuyogun et al [6] Similar sex ratio, distribution of mechanism of injury, distribution of fixation, distribution of frequently involved tendon, artery and nerve, and classification of number and type of laceration and type of repair were seen in both groups, while it did not reach statistical significance. Also, there was no significant difference in the aspects of age, time before emergency, time before surgery, time for emergency hospitalization and DASH score at the final follow-up.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Groupsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations