2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11708-013-0276-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined heat and power economic dispatch problem using the invasive weed optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table 3, it can be observed that the CPU time of TSCO algorithm is much less than all other compared algorithms. In addition, the TSCO algorithm obtains less fuel cost than the algorithm reported in the existing literature, 5,10,12,16,20,28,29,33,[35][36][37] and almost equal fuel cost with the CSO 35 algorithm. As shown in Table 2, the power production and the heat production are 600.6834 MW and 150 WMth, respectively.…”
Section: Test Casementioning
confidence: 88%
“…From Table 3, it can be observed that the CPU time of TSCO algorithm is much less than all other compared algorithms. In addition, the TSCO algorithm obtains less fuel cost than the algorithm reported in the existing literature, 5,10,12,16,20,28,29,33,[35][36][37] and almost equal fuel cost with the CSO 35 algorithm. As shown in Table 2, the power production and the heat production are 600.6834 MW and 150 WMth, respectively.…”
Section: Test Casementioning
confidence: 88%
“…For this case, MRFOA is employed on 300 MW power demand and 150 MWth heat demand, where the optimal solution is compared with respect to those illustrated by various optimization techniques as in Table 1. It is apparently seen that the MRFOA finds a minimum operational costs of 13673.13 $ that is lower than HS [8], firefly algorithm (FA) [42], TVAC-PSO [15], WVO [14], WVO-PSO [14], GSO [37], and IWO [21] where they acquired TFC of 13724. On the other side, it can be observed that EDHS [9] and CPSO [12] attained less TFC values compared to MRFOA, but their operating points were not feasible solutions as described in Figures 3 and 4.…”
Section: ) Casementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [20], a quasidynamic pipeline model for EPHD with start-stop schedule of heat exchange stations is developed. Also, an invasive weed optimizer (IWO) [21] based on the process of weed colonization/distribution has been applied optimal operation of the CES for small scale EPHD problems. In addition, an integrated technique, which combined the civilized swarm optimization (CSO) and the Powell's pattern search (PPS) method [22], has been carried out to solve the EPHD problem in CES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the years since these pioneering works, the imaginativeness of researchers has continued to flourish. New metaheuristic methods have been applied to the CHP dispatch problem such as cuckoo search [23][24][25][26], invasive weed optimization [27], the artificial immune system algorithm [28], the firefly algorithm [29], krill herd optimization [30], the harmony search algorithm [31][32][33][34], grey wolf optimization [35,36], whale optimization [37], and the hybridizing bat algorithm with artificial bee colony [38]. This is by no means an exhaustive list of metaheuristic approaches investigated.…”
Section: Optimal Combined Heat and Power Dispatchmentioning
confidence: 99%