2016
DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined fuzzy logic and random walker algorithm for PET image tumor delineation

Abstract: The proposed technique improves PET lesion delineation at different tumor sites. It depicts greater effectiveness in tumors with smaller size and/or low edge gradients, wherein most PET segmentation algorithms encounter serious challenges. Favorable execution time and accurate performance of the algorithm make it a great tool for clinical applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most published studies used manual contouring performed by experienced physicians as the ground truth. 50 However, manual contouring is prone to large interobserver and intraobserver variabilities and, as such, is questionable as reference for assessment of image segmentation techniques. The contouring variability was assessed quantitatively in multicenter studies reporting a significant interobserver variability with a generalized DSC within the range 0.40-0.80.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published studies used manual contouring performed by experienced physicians as the ground truth. 50 However, manual contouring is prone to large interobserver and intraobserver variabilities and, as such, is questionable as reference for assessment of image segmentation techniques. The contouring variability was assessed quantitatively in multicenter studies reporting a significant interobserver variability with a generalized DSC within the range 0.40-0.80.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TL accuracy quantifies the fraction of times there was any overlap between the predicted and ground-truth segmentations. The HD quantifies shape similarity between the delineated and true tumor boundaries (Foster et al 2014, Soufi et al 2016, with lower values indicating higher shape similarity. HD was computed only for correct TL to quantify shape similarity without the effect of localization errors.…”
Section: Evaluating the Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework was comprehensively evaluated via multiple experiments with independent training and test sets (figure 1(e)). The framework's accuracy on quantifying tumor segmentation and localization in image slices was quantified using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC), true positive fraction, true negative fraction, Hausdorff distance (HD) (Foster et al 2014, Soufi et al 2016, and tumor localization (TL) accuracy. DSC and JSC measure the spatial overlap between the delineated and true tumor masks.…”
Section: Evaluating the Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation