2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-016-1015-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Framework for Automated Segmentation and Labeling of Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Lung Tumors in [18F]FDG-PET Imaging

Abstract: We proposed and demonstrated an automatic framework for significantly improved segmentation and labeling of homogeneous vs. heterogeneous tumors in lung [F]FDG-PET images.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advanced radiographic metrics that quantify heterogeneity in shape and uptake have been explored, primarily in the field of oncology, in order to improve diagnosis as well as prediction of treatment response and survival outcome in different cancers ( Eary et al, 2008 , El Naqa et al, 2009 , Hatt et al, 2015 , Rahmim et al, 2016b , Soufi et al, 2017 , Tixier et al, 2014 , Tixier et al, 2011 , van Velden et al, 2011 , Vriens et al, 2012 ). Overall, the field of radiomics aims to extract a large number of quantitative features from radiological images, aiming to uncover correlates of disease characteristics that are ordinarily not visually observed or quantitatively measured ( Aerts et al, 2014 , Asselin et al, 2012 , Chicklore et al, 2013 , Kumar et al, 2012 , Lambin et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced radiographic metrics that quantify heterogeneity in shape and uptake have been explored, primarily in the field of oncology, in order to improve diagnosis as well as prediction of treatment response and survival outcome in different cancers ( Eary et al, 2008 , El Naqa et al, 2009 , Hatt et al, 2015 , Rahmim et al, 2016b , Soufi et al, 2017 , Tixier et al, 2014 , Tixier et al, 2011 , van Velden et al, 2011 , Vriens et al, 2012 ). Overall, the field of radiomics aims to extract a large number of quantitative features from radiological images, aiming to uncover correlates of disease characteristics that are ordinarily not visually observed or quantitatively measured ( Aerts et al, 2014 , Asselin et al, 2012 , Chicklore et al, 2013 , Kumar et al, 2012 , Lambin et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used a novel fuzzy random walk algorithm, which showed a significantly improved performance relative to conventional random walk segmentation. 6 In the present study, we utilized PET feature maps to segment highly heterogeneous intratumoral regions quantitatively. In accordance with other studies, entropy, as the most popular textural feature in local heterogeneity tumor studies, measures the intratumoral heterogeneity relative to changes in the FDG uptake between voxels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intratumoral heterogeneity refers to the differences within the tumor and provides vital information for the clinical prognosis, and personalized treatment of cancer patients 5 . Thus an accurate delineation of tumor volume and intratumoral heterogeneity can potentially increase the efficacy of radiotherapy by dose escalation of the heterogeneous areas 6,7 . In modern radiotherapy, dose escalation can be applied to administer tailored booster doses to heterogeneous areas using techniques such as intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and also help the patient's treatment response 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fully automated segmentation methods in PET have been proposed, using fuzzy random walk (Soufi et al 2017) or mutual information of CT and PET to identify NSCLC (Weikert et al 2019;Bug et al 2019). U-Net, one of the mostly used CNN architectures for image contouring, has shown to be able to segment pulmonary parenchyma (Ait Skourt et al 2018), and relatively small tumors (1.83 cm 2 ) resulting reproducible across different scanners (dice scores of 74%), relatively uninfluenced by the partial volume effect, and effectively trained with limited data (30 patients yielded a dices score of 70%) (Leung et al 2020).…”
Section: Tumor Detection and Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%