2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2011.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined estrogen–progestogen but not progestogen-only oral contraceptive alters glucose tolerance and plasma lipid profile in female rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have reported the unfavorable impact of combined oral contraceptive use on cardiometabolic disturbances in both human and experimental animal model [7][8][20][21][22]. Third generation COC which are the currently used hormonal contraceptives was introduced to minimize the metabolic effects associated with the use of the first and second generation COC, however these effects still persist [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have reported the unfavorable impact of combined oral contraceptive use on cardiometabolic disturbances in both human and experimental animal model [7][8][20][21][22]. Third generation COC which are the currently used hormonal contraceptives was introduced to minimize the metabolic effects associated with the use of the first and second generation COC, however these effects still persist [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of combined oral contraceptives (COC), has been associated with increased prevalence of obesity and cardiometabolic disturbances [7,8], increase in body weight has often been stated by women as the major reason for discontinuing the use of COC [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16)(17)(18) Estrogen-associated progestin seems to exert more influence on the increase of insulin resistance, being the oral route more influential than the non-oral route.. (17) Progestin, when administered alone, does not appear to interfere with carbohydrate metabolism. (19) A prospective randomized study including 54 women using oral, transdermal and vaginal hormonal contraceptives showed effects on glucose metabolism, however, regardless of the route of administration. (15) However, in addition to the small sample size, the study was based on an observation time of only nine weeks, which was not sufficient to support the conclusion of the study (Table 02).…”
Section: Carbohydrate Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that did not report the influence of the use of HCCs on carbohydrate metabolism corresponded to large literature revisions, used randomized samples or used a large sample and cross-sectional design. (6,10,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) A comparative cross-sectional study with 123 women (25 users and 98 controls) showed that there were no differences between groups in fasting blood glucose. (24) A revision conducted by Cochrane evaluated the effect of hormonal contraceptives on carbohydrate metabolism and showed no important differences in different hormonal combinations and routes of administration in women without diabetes.…”
Section: Piltonen Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glucose (2 g/kg bw) was administered orally (po), and blood glucose was assessed subsequently after 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Glucose tolerance was expressed as a function of the area under the OGTT curve (AUC) as previously described [24] and post-load glucose responses. IR was determined using the homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR = fasting glucose (mmol/L) × fasting insulin (μU/L)/22.5) whereas HOMA-β (20 × fasting insulin (μU/L)/fasting glucose -3.5) and 1-h post-load glucose levels were used to determine pancreatic β-cell function.…”
Section: Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (Ogtt) Ir and Pancreatic β-Celmentioning
confidence: 99%