2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-016-1422-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined electrical resistivity tomography and magnetic resonance sounding investigation of the surface-water/groundwater interaction in the Urema Graben, Mozambique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydrogeophysical methods are up and coming in hydrogeological studies (Chirindja et al, 2016). They have been applied in various conditions, for example in wetlands (Chambers et al, 2014), rivers (Steelman et al, 2015), proglacial moraines (McClymont et al, 2011), karst regions (McCormack et al, 2017), and volcanic systems (Di Napoli et al, 2016;Fikos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrogeophysical methods are up and coming in hydrogeological studies (Chirindja et al, 2016). They have been applied in various conditions, for example in wetlands (Chambers et al, 2014), rivers (Steelman et al, 2015), proglacial moraines (McClymont et al, 2011), karst regions (McCormack et al, 2017), and volcanic systems (Di Napoli et al, 2016;Fikos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nyabeze et al (2010) reported on the occurrence of a low resistivity zone at the Siloam hot spring, from electrical conductivity surveys. Chirindja et al 2016 applied the ERT to investigate the Urema flood plain in Mozambique and confirmed the existence of a semi-confined permeable aquifer confined by a 30 to 40 m clay layer. Chirindja et al 2017 delineated fractured zones in Nampula, Mozambique concluded that the ERT method was better at resolving lateral variations in the bedrock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Typically, a convergence of the data fit was reached after 5-6 iterations. The data fit is expressed in root mean squared (RMS) error, which represents the relative difference between the measured apparent resistivity data and the calculated model response (Chirindja, Dahlin, Perttu, Steinbruch, & Owen, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%