The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf03325936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined effects of water pH and alkalinity on the accumulation of lead, cadmium and chromium to Labeo rohita (Hamilton)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the concentrations of Pb in more than 60% of the fish fresh samples from site 1 were above the maximum permissible level (Figure S1). These results suggested the high translocation of metals in site 1 were likely due to the low sediment pH values (5.22), which might cause the heavy metals to be more soluble and bioavailable [41]. Elevated concentrations of heavy metals in the water environment and its human health risk as a consequence of historical mining have been reported elsewhere all over the world [42], [43].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the concentrations of Pb in more than 60% of the fish fresh samples from site 1 were above the maximum permissible level (Figure S1). These results suggested the high translocation of metals in site 1 were likely due to the low sediment pH values (5.22), which might cause the heavy metals to be more soluble and bioavailable [41]. Elevated concentrations of heavy metals in the water environment and its human health risk as a consequence of historical mining have been reported elsewhere all over the world [42], [43].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In an aquatic environment, metal toxicity can be influenced by various abiotic environmental factors such as oxygen, hardness (Ghillebaert et al 1995), pH, alkalinity and temperature (Adhikari et al 2006). In fishes, apart from the environmental factors, it is also affected by the length and weight of fishes (Nsikak et al 2007) and the time of exposure to metals (Haffor and Al-Ayed 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it is evident that in the pH range 2-4, acid chromate ion HCrO species whereas the CrO 4 2− is the predominant species in the pH range 9-12 [28]. The molar percentage distribution of HCrO 4 − and CrO 4 2− were 95 and 5; 80 and 20; and 2 and 98 for the pH of 5, 6 and 8, respectively [29]. This means that the Cr(VI) was adsorbed on the CtsEn as either the HCrO 4 − or the CrO 4 2− species.…”
Section: Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 95%