2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined control and power hardware in‐the‐loop simulation for testing smart grid control algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The controller parameters and the power‐sharing coefficients are optimized through particle swarm optimization (PSO) solver to enhance the stability of the microgrid. Testing the chain of control algorithms is discussed in Maniatopoulos and Lagos and shown in Figure . As shown in Figure , testing of the microgrids usually starts with pure software simulation to analyze general control algorithm and logics.…”
Section: Real‐time Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controller parameters and the power‐sharing coefficients are optimized through particle swarm optimization (PSO) solver to enhance the stability of the microgrid. Testing the chain of control algorithms is discussed in Maniatopoulos and Lagos and shown in Figure . As shown in Figure , testing of the microgrids usually starts with pure software simulation to analyze general control algorithm and logics.…”
Section: Real‐time Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, EM lies within the focus of this institute as well as low‐voltage grids operated by multiagent systems . Smart grid controllers and other hardware are tested using their power‐hardware‐in‐the‐loop (PHIL) simulation environment and their controller‐hardware‐in‐the‐loop (CHIL) simulation environment …”
Section: Smart Grid Labs Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive summary of PHIL is presented in [26], and a couple of examples of the recent use of PHIL are provided in [27,28]. A representation of the laboratory setup used is depicted in Figure 11.…”
Section: Laboratory Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%