2014
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined analysis of shock absorption capability and force dispersion effect of mouthguard materials with different impact objects

Abstract: The aims of the present study were to investigate the shock absorption capability and force dispersion effect of mouthguard (MG) materials using load cell and film sensors. Two kinds of MG materials, ethylene vinyl acetate and polyolefin, were chosen for this study. When impact forces of approximately 5,000 N were applied on the MG materials using a round flat-nosed rod and a bluntly pointed rod, peak intensities were measured using the load cell sensor while peak stresses and impressed stress distribution are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with EVA, these polymers show higher tensile and tear strength with similar shock absorption capacity [92]. Additionally, polyolefins absorb less water from the oral cavity, which may prevent unwanted swelling, dimensional variations, or bacterial contamination of the protector [93,94]. In the case of mouthguards constituted by laminated sheets, polyolefins showed better interlayer adhesion than EVA sheets, which is essential to prevent the delamination of the device [66].…”
Section: Polyolefinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with EVA, these polymers show higher tensile and tear strength with similar shock absorption capacity [92]. Additionally, polyolefins absorb less water from the oral cavity, which may prevent unwanted swelling, dimensional variations, or bacterial contamination of the protector [93,94]. In the case of mouthguards constituted by laminated sheets, polyolefins showed better interlayer adhesion than EVA sheets, which is essential to prevent the delamination of the device [66].…”
Section: Polyolefinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vacuum‐forming process is commonly used because vacuum‐forming machines are easier to use and are more cost‐effective than pressure‐forming machines . For the thermoforming techniques, mouthguard sheet materials such as ethylene vinyl acetate or polyolefin have been used . Polyolefin shows satisfactory physical properties such as lower water absorption and better adhesive strength compared to ethylene vinyl acetate, and it has high shock‐absorbing capabilities that are similar to ethylene vinyl acetate .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Custom‐made mouthguards can be fabricated using thermoforming techniques (a vacuum‐forming process or a pressure‐forming process), an injection technique, or a packing technique . For the thermoforming techniques, mouthguard sheet materials such as ethylene vinyl acetate and polyolefin have been used commonly . Polyolefin exhibits satisfactory physical properties such as lower water absorption and better adhesive strength which is important when laminating the materials in comparison with ethylene vinyl acetate, and is suitable for use as mouthguard material .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%