2016
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2016.20.3219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinatorial tangle Floer homology

Abstract: In this paper we extend the idea of bordered Floer homology to knots and links in $S^3$: Using a specific Heegaard diagram, we construct gluable combinatorial invariants of tangles in $S^3$, $D^3$ and $I\times S^2$. The special case of $S^3$ gives back a stabilized version of knot Floer homology.Comment: 106 pages, 44 figure

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bijections s → t for s, t ⊂ [n]), which can be drawn as strand diagrams (up to isotopy and Reidemeister III moves), as follows. Represent each p i by a horizontal orange strand [0, 1] × {i − 1 2 } oriented left-to-right if p i = + and right-to-left if p i = − (in [34], those are dashed green strands and double orange strands, respectively). Represent a bijection ϕ : s → t by black strands connecting (0, i) to (1, ϕi) for i ∈ s. We further require that there are no triple intersection points and there are a minimal number of intersection points between strands.…”
Section: Tangle Floer Homologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…bijections s → t for s, t ⊂ [n]), which can be drawn as strand diagrams (up to isotopy and Reidemeister III moves), as follows. Represent each p i by a horizontal orange strand [0, 1] × {i − 1 2 } oriented left-to-right if p i = + and right-to-left if p i = − (in [34], those are dashed green strands and double orange strands, respectively). Represent a bijection ϕ : s → t by black strands connecting (0, i) to (1, ϕi) for i ∈ s. We further require that there are no triple intersection points and there are a minimal number of intersection points between strands.…”
Section: Tangle Floer Homologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another idea is to understand the maps in the skein relation on a local level, by slicing the links involved into tangles and studying a tangle version of knot Floer homology. One such theory is tangle Floer homology, defined by Vértesi and the first author [34]. In this theory, to a sequence of points one associates a differential graded algebra, and to a tangle T ⊂ I × R 2 one associates an A ∞ -module CT(T ) over the differential graded algebra(s) associated to its boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [PV14], Petkova and Vértesi define a theory with similar properties to Ozsváth and Szabó's, which they call tangle Floer homology. Ellis, Petkova, and Vértesi [EPV15] show that the dg algebras of [PV14] categorify a tensor product of irreducible representations of U q (gl(1|1)), each of which is V or V * except for one factor L(λ n+1 ) which is neither V nor V * . The Heegaard diagrams motivating these two theories are different; however, it would be interesting to see whether relationships between the theories exist, especially since both theories are known to compute knot Floer homology in some form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is interesting to compare the ideas described in this paper to the combinatorial tangle Floer theory by Petkova and Vértesi and the algebraic tangle homology theory by Ozsváth and Szabó as well as their corresponding decategorifications in terms of the representation theory of scriptUqfalse(frakturgl(1|1)false) . In fact, the definition of our generalised peculiar modules CFT is primarily inspired by the invariants from , see Remark .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%