2018
DOI: 10.4171/qt/123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the decategorification of Ozsváth and Szabó's bordered theory for knot Floer homology

Abstract: We relate decategorifications of Ozsváth-Szabó's new bordered theory for knot Floer homology to representations of Uq(gl(1|1)). Specifically, we consider two subalgebras Cr(n, S) and C l (n, S) of Ozsváth-Szabó's algebra B(n, S), and identify their Grothendieck groups with tensor products of representations V and V * of Uq(gl(1|1)), where V is the vector representation. We identify the decategorifications of Ozsváth-Szabó's DA bimodules for elementary tangles with corresponding maps between representations. Fi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1.2 generalizes the path-algebra descriptions of B(n, k, S) for n = 1, 2 given in [OSz18,Section 3.5]. Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 have already seen use in [Man19,Man17], as well as in [AD18,Section 4.1]. Theorem 1.2 will be especially useful in [MMW19], where we use it to define a quasi-isomorphism from B(n, k, S) to a certain generalized strands algebra A(n, k, S) as discussed in the motivational section below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 1.2 generalizes the path-algebra descriptions of B(n, k, S) for n = 1, 2 given in [OSz18,Section 3.5]. Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 have already seen use in [Man19,Man17], as well as in [AD18,Section 4.1]. Theorem 1.2 will be especially useful in [MMW19], where we use it to define a quasi-isomorphism from B(n, k, S) to a certain generalized strands algebra A(n, k, S) as discussed in the motivational section below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Remark 3.17. In [Man19], the algebras B r (n, k, S) and B l (n, k, S) were referred to as C r (n, k, S) and C l (n, k, S), following old notation of Ozsváth-Szabó, and shown to categorify tensor products V ⊗S of the vector representation V of U q (gl(1|1)) and its dual (depending on the orientations S). The terminology in the next definitions is also due to Ozsváth-Szabó, although it does not appear explicitly in [OSz18].…”
Section: Idempotent-truncated Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is natural to ask, then, whether Ozsváth-Szabó's theory in [OS16] for knot Floer homology can be viewed as categorifying some U q (gl(1|1))-representation setup. This is indeed the case and will be addressed in [Man16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It is interesting to compare the ideas described in this paper to the combinatorial tangle Floer theory by Petkova and Vértesi and the algebraic tangle homology theory by Ozsváth and Szabó as well as their corresponding decategorifications in terms of the representation theory of scriptUqfalse(frakturgl(1|1)false) . In fact, the definition of our generalised peculiar modules CFT is primarily inspired by the invariants from , see Remark .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%