2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02555c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinatorial approach for screening and assessment of multiple therapeutic enzymes from marine isolatePseudomonas aeruginosaAR01

Abstract: A simple and rapid screening of therapeutic enzymes from bacteria was conducted using functional- and sequence-based approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we evaluated two quantitative methods to develop a high-throughput screening approach of bacterial uricase activity in microtiter plates, with particular focus on conditions relevant to lactobacilli, Bacillus , and Bifidobacterium strains. Using a stepwise approach, we aimed at developing a sensitive, yet robust method using whole bacterial suspensions to enable the simultaneous detection of both extracellular and cell-associated uricase activities, thereby accelerating the screening of large microbial collections and the identification of uricolytic strains independently from the enzyme’s partition ( Watanabe et al, 1969 ; Olivieri et al, 1983 ; Suzuki et al, 2004 ; Kai et al, 2008 ; Lotfy, 2008 ; Zhang et al, 2010 ; Khucharoenphaisan and Sinma, 2011 ; Handayani et al, 2018 ; Jagadeesan et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, we evaluated two quantitative methods to develop a high-throughput screening approach of bacterial uricase activity in microtiter plates, with particular focus on conditions relevant to lactobacilli, Bacillus , and Bifidobacterium strains. Using a stepwise approach, we aimed at developing a sensitive, yet robust method using whole bacterial suspensions to enable the simultaneous detection of both extracellular and cell-associated uricase activities, thereby accelerating the screening of large microbial collections and the identification of uricolytic strains independently from the enzyme’s partition ( Watanabe et al, 1969 ; Olivieri et al, 1983 ; Suzuki et al, 2004 ; Kai et al, 2008 ; Lotfy, 2008 ; Zhang et al, 2010 ; Khucharoenphaisan and Sinma, 2011 ; Handayani et al, 2018 ; Jagadeesan et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, uricase activity was biochemically confirmed in various bacterial taxa, either extracellularly in Pseudomonas strains ( Abdel-Fattah et al, 2005 ; Jagadeesan et al, 2019 ), or intracellularly in Arthrobacter ( Suzuki et al, 2004 ), Microbacterium ( Zhou et al, 2005 ; Kai et al, 2008 ), Streptomyces ( Watanabe et al, 1969 ), Saccharopolyspora ( Khucharoenphaisan and Sinma, 2011 ), Micrococcus ( Olivieri et al, 1983 ), Metabacillus ( Zhang et al, 2010 ), and Bacillus ( Mahler, 1970 ; Bongaerts and Vogels, 1976 ; Bongaerts et al, 1978 ; Huang and Wu, 2004 ; Lee et al, 2005 ; Lotfy, 2008 ) strains. In few lactobacilli strains, uricase activity was suggested to be present both intracellularly and extracellularly ( Handayani et al, 2018 ), thus prompting further investigation of uricase in taxa associated with probiotic strains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%