2015
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202451
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of tumour markers CEA and CA19-9 improves the prognostic prediction in patients with pancreatic cancer

Abstract: Mathematical combinations of pretherapeutic tumour markers CEA and CA19-9 are feasible and can significantly improve the prognostic prediction in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the survival time of patients had no relationships with age, gender and tumor size. Moreover, COX regression analysis showed that the high level of CA19-9 is an independent prognostic factor for evaluating the pancreatic cancer, which was consistent with the part of the results of previous study (Reitz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the survival time of patients had no relationships with age, gender and tumor size. Moreover, COX regression analysis showed that the high level of CA19-9 is an independent prognostic factor for evaluating the pancreatic cancer, which was consistent with the part of the results of previous study (Reitz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Combined use of the two biomarkers can predict prognosis of the patients very well, which is consistent with a previous study,23 in which Reitz et al found that the combination of CEA and CA19-9 was significantly better than CEA or CA19-9 alone in the prognostic prediction of pancreatic cancer. In this study, patients with preoperative CA19-9≥100 U/mL and CEA≥10 μg/mL benefitted little from the surgery, with only 11 months of median survival time, which is not much better than 9 months of survival time in advanced patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine chemotherapy 24,25.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We determined that the combinatorial model provided substantial discriminatory power to differentiate exacerbation versus stable COPD patients, and this was replicated in a validation set. The combinatorial method is not a new concept, and has been utilized in other diseases [40]. Here in our study, we propose the use of a common systemic inflammatory biomarker along with a cardiac stress biomarker as the starting point to diagnose COPD exacerbations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%