2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70096-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combating Adversarial Inputs Using a Predictive-Estimator Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I would speculate that the recurrent loop used by the denoising sampler can be used to make the input images more prototypical which reduces the impact of the low probability events modeled by the PWA. This result is not that surprising as feedback loops have already been shown to improve adversarial robustness (Orchard & Castricato, 2017). This completes my discussion of the inductive biases of the PWA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…I would speculate that the recurrent loop used by the denoising sampler can be used to make the input images more prototypical which reduces the impact of the low probability events modeled by the PWA. This result is not that surprising as feedback loops have already been shown to improve adversarial robustness (Orchard & Castricato, 2017). This completes my discussion of the inductive biases of the PWA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For example, perception and inference could be the result of running the network in feed-forward and feed-back directions simultaneously, like in the wake-sleep approach [25]. Moreover, predictive estimator networks might be a natural implementation for such feedback networks [5], [26], [27]. Continuing in this vein is left for future work and these experiments are ongoing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generative networks might also offer improved robustness to noisy, ambiguous, or adversarial inputs (Orchard & Castricato, 2017) and may play a role in perceiving Gestalt forms (Bartels, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%