1987
DOI: 10.1021/ac00130a020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Column efficiency in micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography

Abstract: Experimental factors that Influence column efficiency In micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography were studied.Parameters, such as applied voltage, column dimensions, and concentrations of buffer and surfactant In the mobile phase, are found to Influence efficiency. Van Deemter-llke plots of plate height vs. applied voltage are used to demonstrate the significance of factors which typically cause band dispersion In chromatography and electrophoresis. Dispersion due to resistance to mass transfer In th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
3
5

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(15 reference statements)
4
43
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…But it was found experimentally that the stacking was not very effective in practice as shown in Fig. 3, which might be caused by the similar reason as reported in CE [32]. Since electroosmosis occurs much more rapidly in the diluted sample solution than the running mobile ing of buffer concentration in sample solutions from 10 to 40 mM KH PO buffers, the reason for which 2 4 (t 2 t ) strength of the sample buffer in CE [33], when the the migration time of a neutral and chromatographelectrokinetic injection with highly ionic strength of ically unretained solute.…”
Section: Selectivity and Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…But it was found experimentally that the stacking was not very effective in practice as shown in Fig. 3, which might be caused by the similar reason as reported in CE [32]. Since electroosmosis occurs much more rapidly in the diluted sample solution than the running mobile ing of buffer concentration in sample solutions from 10 to 40 mM KH PO buffers, the reason for which 2 4 (t 2 t ) strength of the sample buffer in CE [33], when the the migration time of a neutral and chromatographelectrokinetic injection with highly ionic strength of ically unretained solute.…”
Section: Selectivity and Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Slow mass transfer between the micelle, CD, and bulk solution is a likely source of lower efficiencies, since the low aqueous solubility of the dihydrofuroflavones limits their transfer between the CD and micelle pseudophases and the bulk run buffer. Also, the high voltage used in this study produces high micelle velocities, inhibiting the ability of the analyte to exchange rapidly to the CD [26]. Furthermore, this voltage produces significant Joule heating.…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying the same instrumentation as in capillary zone electrophoresis, in MECC uncharged compounds can be separated based on differences in their partitioning between two phases, just as in chromatographic techniques. Since the introduction of MECC by Terabe et al [1,2], several authors have paid attention to the fundamental characteristics of this separation method [3,4] and to the effect of different separation parameters on the migration behavior [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Also the theoret-the solute in the micellar and the aqueous phase, and ts, tEO F and tMC are the migration times of the solute, the electroosmotic flow (EOF) and the micelles, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%