1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb01985.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colour naming of phobia‐related words

Abstract: A version of the Stroop test was developed which requires colour naming of spider words. Spider phobics were severely retarded on this task, but not on the conflicting colour-word Stroop or a Stroop with more general threat words. Desensitization of phobics significantly reduced interference on the Spider Stroop. A third experiment examined the retest properties of the Stroop and the value of equivalent forms. The explanation of the Spider Stroop effect and its usefulness as an outcome measure are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
227
5

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
12
227
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the words are related to events that threaten the individual, whereas other words are emotionally neutral. For example, a person who is afraid of spiders may be shown several stimuli involving words like hairy and crawl (e.g., Watts, McKenna, Sharrock, & Trezise, 1986) as well as stimuli involving neutral words. This research shows that people often take longer to identify the color of stimuli containing threatrelevant words than stimuli containing neutral words (for a review, see J. M. G. Williams, Mathews, & MacLeod, 1996).…”
Section: The Injustice Of Innocent Sufferingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the words are related to events that threaten the individual, whereas other words are emotionally neutral. For example, a person who is afraid of spiders may be shown several stimuli involving words like hairy and crawl (e.g., Watts, McKenna, Sharrock, & Trezise, 1986) as well as stimuli involving neutral words. This research shows that people often take longer to identify the color of stimuli containing threatrelevant words than stimuli containing neutral words (for a review, see J. M. G. Williams, Mathews, & MacLeod, 1996).…”
Section: The Injustice Of Innocent Sufferingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consistent finding in Stroop studies with, for example, spider phobics is that their colour naming of threatening words (e.g., web) is slower than that of neutral words (e.g., car). This would be due to the fact that phobics automatically direct their attention to the content of the threatening words, which in turn interferes with their main task, i.e., colour naming (Watts, McKenna, Sharrock, & Trezise, 1986). There is some evidence that attentional bias also occurs in fearful children.…”
Section: Attentional Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emotional Stroop task is a modified version of the traditional Stroop task (Stroop, 1935) but typically involves participants naming the color of threatening words or pictures, rather than the names of colors. Stroop interference is believed to occur when automatic processing of threatening words reduces the speed of color naming (Watts, McKenna, Sharrock & Trezise, 1986). Stroop bias is frequently described as attentional bias (e.g., Williams et al, 1996) but other authors have argued that the task cannot distinguish between selective attention, inhibitive emotional responses, mental preoccupation, or cognitive avoidance for Stroop words (Bögels & Mansell, 2004), so is perhaps best thought of simply as a processing bias (Nightingale, Field & Kindt, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%