2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00051-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The etiology of specific fears and phobias in children: a critique of the non-associative account

Abstract: The non-associative account of phobic etiology assumes that a number of specific fears (e.g., fear of heights, water, spiders, strangers, and separation) have an evolutionary background and may occur in the absence of learning experiences (e.g., conditioning). By this view, these specific fears pertain to stimuli that once posed a challenge to the survival of our prehistoric ancestors. Accordingly, they would emerge spontaneously during the course of normal development and only in a minority of individuals, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Relying on obvious and salient features of fear stimuli, as reported by a client therefore, might not always be sufficient and a more in-depth and complex analysis might be necessary. In effect, the phenomenon of nonperceptual fear generalization helps make clear why conditioning experiences are not always easily traceable in the clinical context (Muris, Merckelbach, de Jong, & Ollendick, 2002;Poulton & Menzies, 2002).…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of Human Fear Generalization Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relying on obvious and salient features of fear stimuli, as reported by a client therefore, might not always be sufficient and a more in-depth and complex analysis might be necessary. In effect, the phenomenon of nonperceptual fear generalization helps make clear why conditioning experiences are not always easily traceable in the clinical context (Muris, Merckelbach, de Jong, & Ollendick, 2002;Poulton & Menzies, 2002).…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of Human Fear Generalization Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…181-182), one would expect, from the perspective of conditioning theory, that children, who have had less extensive fearless experiences with harmless stimuli than adults (e.g., public places), would be more vulnerable to develop clinical phobias. Another puzzling issue concerns the high prevalence of fear and phobia among mentally retarded children (Gullone, 1996;Gullone, Cummins, & King, 1996;Muris, Merckelbach, De Jongh, & Ollendick, 2002;Ramirez & Kratochwill, 1997) and less educated people (Arnarson, Gudmondsdottir, & Boyle, 1998).…”
Section: Psychoanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in other psychiatric disorders the antagonism nature vs. environment led to a multifactorial model for the manifestation of specific phobias [29]. Cognitive aspects and biases, which consider specific phobias as learned and habituated reactions, are integrated into the non-associative learning theory, i.e., evolution-primed responses to threatening stimuli in predisposed individuals [13,[30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Visual Height Intolerance and The Course Of Anxiety Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%