1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.76.1122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colossal Magnetoresistance of Ferromagnetic Manganites: Structural Tuning and Mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

27
228
3
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 515 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
27
228
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(18), B + exp , T * = 170K, and just obtained z, we get E 0 k /JS = 2.5(n i /n e ) which in turn brings about T C = 195K for the Curie temperature (this value falls into the reported range of the FM transition temperatures for this class of manganites [5][6][7][8] ). Using this temperature and assuming S = 2 for an effective Mn spin, we can estimate the value of the exchange energy J (via the mean-field expression for the critical field H 0 = 3k B T C /2Sµ B ).…”
Section: Magnetization and The Critical Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(18), B + exp , T * = 170K, and just obtained z, we get E 0 k /JS = 2.5(n i /n e ) which in turn brings about T C = 195K for the Curie temperature (this value falls into the reported range of the FM transition temperatures for this class of manganites [5][6][7][8] ). Using this temperature and assuming S = 2 for an effective Mn spin, we can estimate the value of the exchange energy J (via the mean-field expression for the critical field H 0 = 3k B T C /2Sµ B ).…”
Section: Magnetization and The Critical Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the influence of magnetic fluctuations on electron-spin scattering near T MI is expected to be rather important, for they can easily tip a subtle balance between magnetic and electronic processes in favor of either charge localization or delocalization. Besides, the observable difference between the two critical temperatures (usually attributed to the quality of a particular sample used [5][6][7][8] ) is ascribed to the random nonmagnetic scattering which is highly responsible for the magnitude of the observable GMR. 13 On the other hand, in view of its carrier charge (and density) sensitive nature, thermopower (TEP) measurements could complement the traditional MR data and be used as a tool for probing the field-induced delocalization of the carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the resistivity decreases at all measured temperatures with increasing field. This has been ascribed to the strong spin disorder inside the grains by Damay et al 27 But Fontcuberta et al 34 Such type of field response has also seen in polycrystalline LSMO by many authors 38,39 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…8 in which the present data is plotted on the T C -t phase diagram of Terai et al 18 . 27 and Fontcuberta et al 34 In those cases, the low field slope also varies with composition and both the low field and the high field slopes increase with increasing Y content. However, the resistivity decreases at all measured temperatures with increasing field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%