2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.99.064434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colossal electric field control of magnetic anisotropy at ferromagnetic interfaces induced by iridium overlayer

Abstract: Voltage-induced magnetization switching can lead to a new paradigm enabling ultralow-power and high density instant-on nonvolatile magnetoelectric random access memory (MeRAM) devices. Two major challenges for future MeRAM devices are to achieve large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) and high voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy (VCMA) coefficient of heavymetal/ferromagnet/insulator heterostructures (HM/FM/I). Employing ab initio electronic structure calculations we have investigated the effect of epi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MCA per unit interfacial area is determined from E MCA = (E [100] − E [001] )/A, where E [100] and E [001] represent the total energy with in-plane and out-of-plane magnetization, respectively, and A is the in-plane area of the unit cell. The magnetic moment of ∼ 0.1 µ B of the interfacial Ir atom for the Ir(1)/Mn 3 Ga/MgO trilayer is much smaller than that of 0.7 µ B in the Ir(1ML)/FeCo/MgO, indicating a stronger hybridization effect in the Ir/Mn 3 Ga interface 43,44 . On the other hand, the emergence of magnetism on the Ir atoms in the Ir(3)/Mn 3 Ga(5)/MgO(5) heterostructures can be attributed to the proximity effect as the freestanding 3ML Ir is nonmag- netic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The MCA per unit interfacial area is determined from E MCA = (E [100] − E [001] )/A, where E [100] and E [001] represent the total energy with in-plane and out-of-plane magnetization, respectively, and A is the in-plane area of the unit cell. The magnetic moment of ∼ 0.1 µ B of the interfacial Ir atom for the Ir(1)/Mn 3 Ga/MgO trilayer is much smaller than that of 0.7 µ B in the Ir(1ML)/FeCo/MgO, indicating a stronger hybridization effect in the Ir/Mn 3 Ga interface 43,44 . On the other hand, the emergence of magnetism on the Ir atoms in the Ir(3)/Mn 3 Ga(5)/MgO(5) heterostructures can be attributed to the proximity effect as the freestanding 3ML Ir is nonmag- netic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The thin Ir overlayer was considered because it was shown to increase both the PMA and VCMA efficiency in FeCo-based heterostructures. [41][42][43][44][45] Density functional theory (DFT) calculations within the projector augmented-wave (PAW) method, 46 were carried out using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) 47 . We use the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) to describe the exchange-correlation energy as parametrized by Perdew et al 48 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where ξ is the SOC constant; o ↑ (u ↑ ) and o ↓ (u ↓ ) denote the occupied (unoccupied) spin-up and spin-down eigenstates, respectively; o ↑ (u ↑ ) and o ↓ (u ↓ ) represent eigenvalues of occupied (unoccupied) spin-up and spindown states, respectively; the L z (L x ) are the angular momentum operators. This theory has been used to successfully explain the K i distribution of interfacial Fe over Brillouin zone in Fe/MgO, 40,41 Fe/CuInSe 2 , 42 and Fe/MgAl 2 O 4 . 31 For a system with a large spin polarization like MgO/Co 2 FeAl, the coupling effects from the opposite spin channel can be neglected, and thus the MAE is mainly determined by the coupling between the occupied and unoccupied spin-down states near the Fermi level.…”
Section: A Uncapped Mgo/co2fealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For iron monolayers that are adsorbed on a vicinal iridium surface, the maximum local magnetic moment is located at the edge atom, whereas the least is at the kink atoms 34 . For Ir / FeCo bilayers on MgO, the Ir cap layer can induce both a large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) and a colossally high voltage controlled magnetic anisotropy efficiency by the strain introduced at the interface 35 . The Fe monolayer tends to be antiferromagnetic for iron on Ir(100) with a relaxed geometry, while an unrelaxed Fe/Ir(001) sample exhibits a ferromagnetic ground state 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%