1998
DOI: 10.1159/000018589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorectal Follow-Up Planning Modified on the Basis of Our Personal Experience

Abstract: Background: The authors, evaluating the disappointing follow-up results in patients suffering from colorectal carcinoma who had undergone surgery for cure, tried a more rational follow-up. Methods: In a retrospective review about 232 patients who adhered to the follow-up protocol, we evaluated the accuracy rates of CEA, liver ultrasonography and abdominal CT. In the same group of patients, we evaluated the type of correlation between the neoplastic recurrence rate and Astler-Coller’s classification. Results: (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An earlier study comparing the efficacy of liver ultrasound vs. CEA monitoring in detecting hepatic recurrences showed that CEA measurement appeared to have a better sensitivity and negative predictive value, although the difference was not statistically significant. 18 This coupled with the finding that recurrences were more likely in patients with C1, C2, and D tumors in the Astler-Coller classification determined the authors to renounce routine liver ultrasonography and customize their follow-up protocol on primary tumor staging. Our own results seem to support the concept that liver imaging is better reserved for patients found to have abnormal clinical signs and/or biochemical parameters, and the act that patients with early-stage cancers (AstlerColler A and B1) have a greatly reduced risk of developing liver recurrences compared with those with more advanced tumors (P = 0.002, Pearson chisquared test).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earlier study comparing the efficacy of liver ultrasound vs. CEA monitoring in detecting hepatic recurrences showed that CEA measurement appeared to have a better sensitivity and negative predictive value, although the difference was not statistically significant. 18 This coupled with the finding that recurrences were more likely in patients with C1, C2, and D tumors in the Astler-Coller classification determined the authors to renounce routine liver ultrasonography and customize their follow-up protocol on primary tumor staging. Our own results seem to support the concept that liver imaging is better reserved for patients found to have abnormal clinical signs and/or biochemical parameters, and the act that patients with early-stage cancers (AstlerColler A and B1) have a greatly reduced risk of developing liver recurrences compared with those with more advanced tumors (P = 0.002, Pearson chisquared test).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results concerning the validity of CEA determination for early diagnosis of postoperative hepatic metastases have already been published [6,9]. Sensitivity, positive prognostic value (PPV) and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of biliary CEA in detecting hepatic metastases were determined in the entire study cohort.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some evidence to suggest that CT scanning as part of a routine follow up programme may be useful. [110][111][112][113][114][115] One randomised controlled trial found that follow up is efficient and cost effective if patients at higher risk are followed up more intensively than those at lower risk. 116 Patients at greatest risk are those with more advanced tumours at the time of resection-particularly stage III cancers.…”
Section: Follow Upmentioning
confidence: 99%