1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02556803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorectal cancer

Abstract: The purpose of this article was to review the effectiveness of follow-up in patients with colorectal cancer submitted to curative treatment. A comprehensive follow-up involves rational initial management of the primary tumor, knowledge of prognostic factors, selection of the patient to be followed, determination of the time for follow-up, use of the most appropriate tests for early diagnosis of recurrence, and eventual curative treatment. The updated answers to all these questions are given through an extensiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 But its utilization as a tool to detect recurrent disease in patients following curative resection of colorectal cancers has been well documented. [21][22][23][24] However, in this current series, only half of the patients with isolated lung metastases were found to have elevated CEA levels during follow-up after initial curative surgery. This was not surprising, as CEA levels were shown to be especially useful in the detection of recurrent disease in the liver with sensitivity of up to 80%, while CEA was much less reliable at predicting recurrent disease in other locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…20 But its utilization as a tool to detect recurrent disease in patients following curative resection of colorectal cancers has been well documented. [21][22][23][24] However, in this current series, only half of the patients with isolated lung metastases were found to have elevated CEA levels during follow-up after initial curative surgery. This was not surprising, as CEA levels were shown to be especially useful in the detection of recurrent disease in the liver with sensitivity of up to 80%, while CEA was much less reliable at predicting recurrent disease in other locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Moreover, risk factors that had been previously associated with increased recurrence rates were also considered: sex, age, tumour size, tumour location, tumour differentiation, and preoperative serum CEA levels [27, 28, 29]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25] do not agree with this view and claim that the best results, albeit in a limited range, are obtained in follow-up patients and that recurrences can be sometimes successfully reoperated, especially in asymptomatic patients [3, 23, 26]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%