1997
DOI: 10.1128/iai.65.8.3345-3351.1997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonization of congenitally immunodeficient mice with probiotic bacteria

Abstract: We assessed the capacity of four probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus casei GG, and Bifidobacterium animalis) to colonize, infect, stimulate immune responses in, and affect the growth and survival of congenitally immunodeficient gnotobiotic beige-athymic (bg/bg-nu/nu) and beige-euthymic (bg/bg-nu/؉) mice. The bacteria colonized and persisted, in pure culture, in the alimentary tracts of both mouse strains for the entire study period (12 weeks). Although all adult … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The raised saliva levels of NO prior to C. albicans challenge, following ingestion of L. acidophilus, suggests that L. acidophilus stimulates additional mechanisms, possibly involving macrophages, as enhanced secretion of IL-4 from stimulated T cells was not detected at the time of the infection challenge. Several bacterial species have been shown to induce nonspecific protection against experimental infection in mice [19,[32][33][34] by enhancing the host immune response [35,36]. For example, adult and neonatal immune deficient nude mice fed L. acidophilus are protected against orogastric challenge with live C. albicans [24,33,34], whereas heat-killed L. acidophilus were not effective, suggesting that either colonization or actively secreted factors were protective [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The raised saliva levels of NO prior to C. albicans challenge, following ingestion of L. acidophilus, suggests that L. acidophilus stimulates additional mechanisms, possibly involving macrophages, as enhanced secretion of IL-4 from stimulated T cells was not detected at the time of the infection challenge. Several bacterial species have been shown to induce nonspecific protection against experimental infection in mice [19,[32][33][34] by enhancing the host immune response [35,36]. For example, adult and neonatal immune deficient nude mice fed L. acidophilus are protected against orogastric challenge with live C. albicans [24,33,34], whereas heat-killed L. acidophilus were not effective, suggesting that either colonization or actively secreted factors were protective [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…© 2005 British Society for Immunology, Clinical and Experimental Immunology , 141:[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the same researchers also showed that Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus casei GG, or Bifidobacterium animalis in the GI-tract of these mice prolonged their survival and decreased the severity of mucosal and systemic candidiasis by modulating immune responses, decreasing the number of C. albicans in the alimentary tract, and by reducing the numbers of orogastric infections. The results demonstrated not only that probiotic bacteria have biotherapeutic potential for prophylaxis against and therapy of this fungal disease, but also that probiotic bacteria protect mice from candidiasis by a variety of immunological (thymic and extrathymic) and non-immunological mechanisms (38).…”
Section: Probioticsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Lactobacilli can translocate, i.e. pass viable across the intestinal barrier [4][5][6]. Still, they rarely cause serious infection, except for rare cases in individuals with a pre-existing structural heart disease or severe immunodeficiency [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%