1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01375.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonialism and Its Others: Considerations On Rights and Care Discourses

Abstract: I point to a colonial care discourse that enabled colonizers to define themselves in relationship to “inferior” colonized subjects. The colonized, however, had very different accounts of this relationship. While contemporary care discourse correctly insists on acknowledging human needs and relationships, it needs to worry about who defines these often contested terms. I conclude that improvements along dimensions of care and of justice often provide “enabling conditions” for each other.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
78
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It violates their moral agency, isolates them, and perpetuates their inferior status by allowing dominant agents to override their expressed wishes and act paternalistically towards them ( [58], p. 135). This façade of the care discourse, which denies the "others" as equals who deserve equal moral standings, constructs those with impairment as inferior, in need of the paternalistic guidance and rule of their non-disabled superiors to promote their welfare ( [66], p. 135). In extending special protections, such paternalistic measures reinforce and yet conceal epistemic oppression and selfserving relationships of power and domination.…”
Section: So… Not Autonomous?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It violates their moral agency, isolates them, and perpetuates their inferior status by allowing dominant agents to override their expressed wishes and act paternalistically towards them ( [58], p. 135). This façade of the care discourse, which denies the "others" as equals who deserve equal moral standings, constructs those with impairment as inferior, in need of the paternalistic guidance and rule of their non-disabled superiors to promote their welfare ( [66], p. 135). In extending special protections, such paternalistic measures reinforce and yet conceal epistemic oppression and selfserving relationships of power and domination.…”
Section: So… Not Autonomous?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The media selects which crimes it will highlight often from a racist slant (Stewart-Harawira, 1997). This is a continuation of what Narayan (1995) refers to as a Colonial Rights and Care Discourse where the paternalistic guidance of the nation portrays itself as promoting the welfare of the colonised while at the same time marginalising them as 'the other', as deviant and in need of instruction. It also justifies the removal of rights that other citizens have by placing them under greater scrutiny.…”
Section: Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is within the interest of the dominant culture to portray Mäori culture itself as being deficient because it maintains a feeling of superiority (Narayan, 1995). It means that Mäori continually need the coloniser because we can't deal with these things on our own.…”
Section: Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim como Uma Narayan observou, o colonialismo foi um discurso da política do cuidado. (Narayan, 1995(Narayan, , 1997. Então, como podemos distinguir o bom do mau cuidado?…”
unclassified