Colonial Encounters in Ancient Iberia a Coda

Dietler, Michael; López-Ruiz, Carolina

doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148489.003.0012

Cited by 17 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Considering the emerging picture of the Anatolian Pontic coast in light of contemporary examples of colonial-indigenous relations in other regions yields some important contrasts and parallels. Dietler's analysis of colonial-indigenous relations in Massalia (Marseille) and the western Mediterranean highlights the importance of indigenous agency in the entanglement of communities (Dietler, 1997(Dietler, , 2010Dietler and López-Ruiz, 2009). He has highlighted the central importance of wine as a commodity produced by colonial communities in response to strong indigenous demand, and the adaptation of the rituals and material accoutrements of social drinking by indigenous communities.…”

Section: Towards a Working Model Of Iron Age Settlement On The Sinop mentioning

confidence: 99%

Xenophon in a Black Sea Landscape: Settlement Models for the Iron Age on the Sinop Promontory (Turkey)

Doonan

2018

Eur. j. archaeol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research into the Iron Age of Anatolia has seldom paid sufficient attention to settlement patterns and the social organization of space. TheAnabasisby Xenophon records the observations of a Greek outsider who travelled across eastern Anatolia and along the Black Sea coast in 400bce, a time that was relatively early in the colonial process in this area. Xenophon's observations are used to establish a basic model for settlement in the Black Sea coastal region of Anatolia, which is then tested against the results of recent archaeological surveys and related research on the Sinop promontory. A fuller and richer model of indigenous Iron Age settlement and colonial engagement on the Sinop promontory is developed and considered in light of recent research on colonization in the western Mediterranean and northern Black Sea regions.

show abstract

Section: Towards a Working Model Of Iron Age Settlement On The Sinop mentioning

confidence: 99%

Xenophon in a Black Sea Landscape: Settlement Models for the Iron Age on the Sinop Promontory (Turkey)

Doonan

2018

Eur. j. archaeol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…157 Važ-nost stranih predmeta ne leži u značenju koje oni imaju za društvo iz kojeg potječu, već u kulturnom značenju i društvenoj upotrebi tih predmeta u kontekstu potrošnje zajednice koje ih nabavlja. 158 Sukladno tomu, preuzimanje ili odbacivanje stranih dobara treba promatrati u kontekstu lokalnih kulturnih običaja i načina društvene komunikacije. U ovom slučaju važnost importiranih posuda naglašena je upravo njihovim prilaganjem u grobove.…”

Section: Materials Cultureunclassified

“…157 The importance of foreign objects is not in what they represent in the society from which they originated, but for their cultural meaning and social use in the context of consumption among those who adopted them. 158 Thus, the adoption and rejection of foreign goods needs to be understood in terms of local cultural practices and modes of social discourse. In this case study, the importance of imported pots is highlighted mostly by the fact that they were placed inside graves.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Promišljanja o identitetu, etnicitetu i "helenizaciji" predrimske Liburnije

Barnett

2017

MHM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Opće je prihvaćeno da su Liburni u jednom periodu željeznog doba vladali velikim dijelom Jadrana. Profesor Slobodan Čače prvi je znanstvenik koji je, analizirajući pisane izvore, doista propitivao takve zaključke. Cilj ovog rada je stoga nadovezati se na znanstvenu djelatnost prof. Čače i pokušati kroz analizu antičkih pisanih izvora propitati pitanje identiteta u predrimskoj Liburniji. Osim toga, rad je multidisciplinaran te se obrađuje i poimanje identiteta i kulturnog razvoja kroz materijalnu kulturu. Preispituje se i liburnski identitet kroz arheološke nalaze, kao i transformacije koje je on doživio tijekom željeznog doba, a s osobitim fokusom na ideje o etno-kulturnim identitetima i "helenizaciji" u interpretaciji razvoja Liburnije tijekom zadnjih četiri stoljeća prije Krista.KLJUČNE RIJEČI: Liburnija, željezno doba, identitet, etnicitet, helenizacija, materijalna kultura Abstract It is widely accepted that the Liburni, at some point in the Iron Age, ruled over much of the Adriatic. Professor Slobodan Čače was the first scholar to truly challenge these narratives through a critique of the written sources. The aim of this paper is to build upon the work of Čače in seeking to rethink identities in pre-Roman Liburnia through analysis of ancient literary sources. It also takes a multidisciplinary approach, and seeks to address ideas about identity and cultural change through material culture. A reexamination is undertaken into Liburnian identity through archaeological evidence, and the transformations it apparently went through during the Iron Age, focusing on ideas about ethno-cultural identities and 'Hellenization' in interpretations of developments in Liburnia during the last 4 centuries BCE.KEYWORDS: Liburnia; Iron Age; identity; ethnicity; Hellenization; material culture Charles Barnett, Promišljanja o identitetu, etnicitetu i "helenizaciji"..., MHM, 3, 2016MHM, 3, (2017, 63-97 64 1. UVOD U modernoj znanosti Liburni i Liburnia prihvaćeni su kao termini koji označavaju spomenutu etničku grupu i teritorij na kojem se ona prostirala, odnosno na teritoriju današnje Hrvatske prostor od rijeke Raše do rijeke Krke te sve obližnje otoke. Taj identitet temelji se na izjavama antičkih izvora koji smještaju Liburne na spomenuti teritorij. 1 Na osnovi antičkih izvora koji navode da se oni nalaze i izvan tog matičnog teritorija, opće je prihvaćeno da su Liburni u jednom periodu između 800. i 500. g. pr. Kr. (ili čak do 385. g. pr. Kr.) gospodarili velikim dijelom istočne i zapadne obale Jadrana.2 Arheolozi su identificirali najvažnije karakteristike materijalne kulture glavnih liburnskih teritorija tijekom željeznog doba i putem toga ustanovili "etnogenezu" Liburna. Pretpostavlja se da je taj proces započeo tijekom prijelaza iz brončano u željezno doba i trajao sve do zadnjih stoljeća pr. Kr., kada su helenistički utjecaji drastično promijenili njegov smjer, da bi na kraju on završio inkorporiranjem liburnskih zajednica u Rimsko Carstvo i početkom "romanizacije". To su uhodani modeli interpretacije liburnskog...

show abstract

The Archaeology of the Mediterranean Iron Age

Hodos

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Colonial Encounters in Ancient Iberia a Coda

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

Xenophon in a Black Sea Landscape: Settlement Models for the Iron Age on the Sinop Promontory (Turkey)

Xenophon in a Black Sea Landscape: Settlement Models for the Iron Age on the Sinop Promontory (Turkey)

Promišljanja o identitetu, etnicitetu i "helenizaciji" predrimske Liburnije

The Archaeology of the Mediterranean Iron Age

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About