1938
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.22.3.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colobomata of the Optic Nerve Sheath in Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1943
1943
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Similar colobomata, also associated with no sign of a lamina cribrosa, have already been reported in the rat (Nicholls and Tansley, 1938 Investigation of other laboratory mammals revealed that the rabbit also has no collagen at the site of entry of the optic nerve into the eye. Associated with this condition there was an almost universal cupping of the optic disc, more or less severe (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…3). Similar colobomata, also associated with no sign of a lamina cribrosa, have already been reported in the rat (Nicholls and Tansley, 1938 Investigation of other laboratory mammals revealed that the rabbit also has no collagen at the site of entry of the optic nerve into the eye. Associated with this condition there was an almost universal cupping of the optic disc, more or less severe (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Although Nicholls (1938) reproduced these results; he found that some two-thirds of the posterior ciliary arteries had to be tied off before degeneration occurred, and that this degeneration affected rods and cones similarly as regards rate and extent. He concluded that the necessary interference with the blood supply was so extensive that a similar interference was unlikely to be the cause of spontaneous retinal degeneration in man.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(c) Occasional Anomalies.-We have observed colobomata adjacent to the optic papilla as described by Nicholls and Tansley (1938), and Blessig-Henle cavities in the extreme peripheral 500 of the non-tapetal fundus as described by Zurn (1902). The incidence of each anomaly was about I *5 per cent of the eyes examined histologically.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%