2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2006.01109
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision Probabilities for Continuous-Time Systems Without Sampling [with Appendices]

Abstract: Demand for high-performance, robust, and safe autonomous systems has grown substantially in recent years. Fulfillment of these objectives requires accurate and efficient risk estimation that can be embedded in core decision-making tasks such as motion planning. On one hand, Monte-Carlo (MC) and other sampling-based techniques can provide accurate solutions for a wide variety of motion models but are cumbersome to apply in the context of continuous optimization. On the other hand, "direct" approximations aim to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gap between the risk guarantee and the obtained risk can be reduced, for example, by assuming some knowledge of the distribution or by running multiple scenario programs in parallel. Alternatively, the risk could be analyzed in continuous time (see for example [43]) to reduce discretization errors. The proposed method is widely applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gap between the risk guarantee and the obtained risk can be reduced, for example, by assuming some knowledge of the distribution or by running multiple scenario programs in parallel. Alternatively, the risk could be analyzed in continuous time (see for example [43]) to reduce discretization errors. The proposed method is widely applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collision probability for each step is taken as the maximum one among all obstacles. As mentioned in [24], summing the collision probabilities at discrete time steps will double count the probability. Thus the risk here (i.e.…”
Section: B Iterative Trajectory Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%