2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision of two action potentials in a single excitable cell

Abstract: Background. It is a common incident in nature, that two waves or pulses run into each other head-on.The outcome of such an event is of special interest, because it allows conclusions about the underlying physical nature of the pulses. The present experimental study dealt with the head-on meeting of two action potentials (AP) in a single excitable plant cell (Chara braunii internode).Methods. The membrane potential was monitored at the two extremal regions of an excitable cell. In control experiments, an AP was… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the collisions of two impulses propagating in orthodromic and antidromic directions in the giant axons of earthworms and lobsters did not result in the annihilation of the two signals, contrary to the notion on the refractory period in the Hodgkin – Huxley model 5 . This contradiction has been repeatedly found later by other researchers 6 . Heimberg and Jackson et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the collisions of two impulses propagating in orthodromic and antidromic directions in the giant axons of earthworms and lobsters did not result in the annihilation of the two signals, contrary to the notion on the refractory period in the Hodgkin – Huxley model 5 . This contradiction has been repeatedly found later by other researchers 6 . Heimberg and Jackson et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This model has supporting evidences from previous experiments and computational simulations that there were changes of local heat and membrane displacement along with the action potential process 9 – 13 . The model could explain the non-annihilation condition of the two signals in collision 5 , 6 , by describing the nerve signals as waves for the first time. Nevertheless, it encounters problems in explaining the “ saltatory conduction ” in myelinated axons and the neural transmission in poikilotherm 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to collisions in particular, the predictions of the theoretical analysis of colliding pulses reveals no annihilation (less than 4%) in soliton models [32,33], which is in clear contrast to our results that demonstrate significant (up to 80%) decrease in amplitude upon collision. In fact we observe annihilation of colliding pulses both in lipid monolayers as well as Algae [34]. In addition to correctly accounting for nonlinearity and dispersion, internal heat transfer in the colliding pulses is also central to an understanding of the annihilation phenomenon, which requires incorporating the nonlinear viscosity resulting from relaxation of phase change in the hydrodynamic equations as well [22,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the literature, several experimental studies were conducted in various nerve fibers or cells to examine whether annihilation can occur or not on AP collision [66][67][68][69][70]. It has been frequently witnessed that colliding APs are reciprocally annihilated instead of penetrating each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%