2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2006.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision efficiencies empirically determined from laboratory investigations of collisional growth of small raindrops in a laminar flow field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For its entire range of air speeds the tunnel shows a turbulence level of less than 0.5% (Vohl 1989). The wind tunnel facility allows the observation of single events without wall effects under controlled temperatures between 308C and 2308C, dew points from 2408C to saturation (ambient temperature), and wind speeds from 10 cm s 21 up to 40 m s 21 .…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its entire range of air speeds the tunnel shows a turbulence level of less than 0.5% (Vohl 1989). The wind tunnel facility allows the observation of single events without wall effects under controlled temperatures between 308C and 2308C, dew points from 2408C to saturation (ambient temperature), and wind speeds from 10 cm s 21 up to 40 m s 21 .…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no data available for collectors larger than 300 µm in radius, a size range that has appreciable concentrations in medium to heavy rain, or for particles with size ratios less than 0.05, which can include particles from 0.5 to 10 µm in radius. As well, collision efficiencies for collectors smaller than 30 µm were later found to be underestimated (Vohl et al, 2007). These deficiencies appear to be the main causes of the lower values of rain for particles in the diameter range from 1.0 to 10.0 µm compared to the rest of the rain formulas.…”
Section: Mwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus removed the rain profiles based on the E(d, D p ) formulation of Park et al (2005) from further consideration since there was no easy way to fix the problem. We noticed, however, that Vohl et al (2007) had updated the Hall (1980) table with new experimental results that provided more realistic collision efficiencies for wider size ranges for both collector and collected particles. Thus, we chose to keep the rain profiles based on the E(d, D p ) scheme of Ackerman et al (1995) for further analysis, but these were modified profiles based on the updated collision efficiency table of Vohl et al (2007) in place of the Hall (1980) With this finalized selection of the available E(d, D p ) formulas (Table 1), there are 320 rain profiles based on different combinations of the product terms that are retained for further analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Mwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collection efficiency differs from unity if hydrodynamic effects (e.g. Vohl et al, 2007) or van der Waals forces (Rogers and Davis, 1990) are considered. The whole coalescence kernel may take a different form (in particular, may be nonzero for drops of equal terminal velocity) if turbulence effects are taken into account (Grabowski and Wang, 2013, and references therein).…”
Section: Coalescencementioning
confidence: 99%