2014
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-7-799-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a new semi-empirical parameterization for below-cloud scavenging of size-resolved aerosol particles by both rain and snow

Abstract: Abstract.A parameter called the scavenging coefficient is widely used in aerosol chemical transport models (CTMs) to describe below-cloud scavenging of aerosol particles by rain and snow. However, uncertainties associated with available size-resolved theoretical formulations for span one to two orders of magnitude for rain scavenging and nearly three orders of magnitude for snow scavenging. Two recent reviews of below-cloud scavenging of size-resolved particles recommended that the upper range of the availab… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
96
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(88 reference statements)
11
96
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The gravitational collection of particles below clouds by precipitation is typically included in global aerosol models and has been investigated in earlier studies of collection efficiency (Greenfield, 1957;Klett and Davis, 1973;Lin and Lee, 1975;Schlamp et al, 1976;Wang et al, 1978;Hall, 1980), parameterizations (Slinn, 1984;Jung and Lee, 1997;Croft et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2014) and recent reviews , so we will not focus on these effects in this paper. Brownian coagulation of cloud droplets and interstitial particles still occurs in precipitating clouds, but the collecting cloud droplets will only be wet scavenged/deposited if they are converted into a precipitation drop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravitational collection of particles below clouds by precipitation is typically included in global aerosol models and has been investigated in earlier studies of collection efficiency (Greenfield, 1957;Klett and Davis, 1973;Lin and Lee, 1975;Schlamp et al, 1976;Wang et al, 1978;Hall, 1980), parameterizations (Slinn, 1984;Jung and Lee, 1997;Croft et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2014) and recent reviews , so we will not focus on these effects in this paper. Brownian coagulation of cloud droplets and interstitial particles still occurs in precipitating clouds, but the collecting cloud droplets will only be wet scavenged/deposited if they are converted into a precipitation drop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, scavenging of particle-bound mercury by snow is efficient particularly at higher latitudes [Amos et al, 2012]. Particle scavenging by snow is theoretically more efficient than rain because of the larger surface area of snow [Wang et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2015]. Figure 4 illustrates that %GOM contributions to Hg wet deposition were greater than %FPBM and %CPBM at all sites in the summer (June-August), indicating the predominance of gas scavenging of Hg.…”
Section: Snow Scavengingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The importance of CPBM in the dry deposition budget was demonstrated in field data and modeling results [Fang et al, 2012]. Considering that particle scavenging by rain (size-resolved scavenging coefficient) and particle dry deposition (size-resolved dry deposition velocity) are greater for coarse particles than accumulation mode particles [Petroff and Zhang, 2010;Wang et al, 2014], CPBM may contribute more than FPBM to the wet deposition budget. …”
Section: Estimation Of Gom Fpbm and Cpbm Contributions To Hg Wet Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the calculation of wet deposition is repeated using upper and lower values of the mean ± the standard error of previously published values for Z (Z = 460 and 305 respectively), providing an estimated range for the flux of pollutant elements from the atmosphere to the surface. As the relative scavenging efficiency of snow is largely unknown (Wang et al, 2014), a single Z value is applied to the total precipitation amount. Likewise, the application of a single mean value to all trace elements is necessitated by the dearth of available data for many of the pollutants considered in this study.…”
Section: Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%